What Is True/Slant?
275+ knowledgeable contributors.
Reporting and insight on news of the moment.
Follow them and join the news conversation.
 

Nov. 4 2009 - 4:09 pm | 78 views | 1 recommendation | 2 comments

How much did Bloomberg really spend?

New York City Mayor Michael Bloomberg opening ...

Image via Wikipedia

Mike Bloomberg won last night, but barely–with 5% of the vote, which is absolutely less than the margin of victory $100 million is supposed to buy you. But it’s a victory nonetheless. Having won three elections, he’ll be mayor of New York City for twelve consecutive years. Mike Bloomberg has effectively bought the lease to Gracie Mansion. In total, how much has it cost him? What price does a vote fetch these days?

Let’s start with last night. Although official, final campaign disclosures aren’t yet available, it’s been widely reported that he spent $100 million of his own money. For his troubles, he received 557,000 votes. Hold those numbers in your head for a moment.

In 2005, he spent $78 million and received 753,000 votes; in 2001, the totals were $71 million and 744,00.

All told, this means that Bloomberg has spent $249 million to receive 2.54 million votes–meaning, over his political career, he’s spent about $121 per vote.

But I think even that underestimates the true scope of his political spending.  The Times reported in 2008 that, since 2002, Bloomberg has given out $175 million to groups throughout the city, through the auspices of the Carnegie Corporation. Technically, the donations are anonymous, but everyone knows Bloomberg is the one behind them. And he hasn’t been afraid to ask for the favor to be returned; in the midst of his drive to overturn term limits last year, leaders of several organizations that had benefited from Bloomberg’s largesse testified on his behalf before the New York City council. (Read about it here.) It’s also no coincidence that his donations to Carnegie have spiked during election seasons.  His donations aren’t a simple function of a charitable streak: they’re designed to further his political interests. It’s certainly possible that, without them, he would not have been elected last night.

So it would seem to include them in any final tally. Effectively, Bloomberg has spent $424 million on his political career–which breaks down to about $206 per vote.

That’s an enormous amount of money, and the best evidence of New York City’s emerging plutocracy that I’ve yet seen. To put this in a little perspective, Barack Obama spent about $10.50 per vote to win the White House.

The sad thing is that New York City has some decent public financing laws. Yet no one can compete when one person is willing to spend this amount of money. Of course, wealthy people–even obscenely wealthy people, like Bloomberg–should be allowed to run for office. But when they’re allowed to buy the office that they seek, they do real damage to our democracy–damage that may be difficult to undo.


Comments

2 Total Comments
Post your comment »
 
Log in for notification options
Comments RSS

Post Your Comment

You must be logged in to post a comment

Log in with your True/Slant account.

Previously logged in with Facebook?

Create an account to join True/Slant now.

Facebook users:
Create T/S account with Facebook
 

My T/S Activity Feed

 
     

    About Me

    I live in Washington, D.C., a few blocks away from the White House--hence the title of this blog. In my day job, I'm the associate editor of Democracy: A Journal of Ideas (www.democracyjournal.org). I've written for The Nation, Politico, The New Republic, Mother Jones, and the NY Daily News, among other places. This blog will be about politics and the Red Sox.

    See my profile »
    Followers: 37
    Contributor Since: May 2009
    Location:The Capitol

    What I'm Up To

    • Jared Bernstein profile

      I’ve written a piece for Mother Jones about Jared Bernstein, Obama’s top progressive economic advisor. Is he a token, or does his role signal something broader about the administration’s intentions? Check out the piece here.

       
    • Obama’s first draft

      Barack Obama’s success last fall was unlikely, but did not come out nowhere–he owes a lot to the pioneering work of Cesar Chavez, farm worker organizer of the 1960’s and ’70s. Or so I argue in the latest issue of In These Times. Check it out here.

       
    .<
    • +O
    • +O
    >.