What Is True/Slant?
275+ knowledgeable contributors.
Reporting and insight on news of the moment.
Follow them and join the news conversation.
 

Jun. 18 2009 - 11:20 am | 1 views | 1 recommendation | 0 comments

The demagogue returns!

George W. Bush Portrait

Image by J. Stephen Conn via Flickr

George W. Bush emerged this morning from whatever rock he had been hiding under to unleash the kind of reason-free rant his presidency was known for. In particular, he honed in on Obama’s overhaul of Guantanamo. Said #43:

“I told you I’m not going to criticize my successor,” he said. “I’ll just tell you that there are people at Gitmo that will kill American people at a drop of a hat and I don’t believe that — persuasion isn’t going to work. Therapy isn’t going to cause terrorists to change their mind.”

Since leaving office, Bush had drawn praise from all quarters–including David Axelrod–for staying silent about Obama’s policies. Unlike his vice president, Bush seemed to understand the American people’s verdict on his presidency. But these comments demontrate that his silence was just a political calculation, designed to give his eventual criticism maximum impact.

Fortunately, the criticism is so off-the-wall, so thoroughly dishonest, that it’s easy to dismiss.  Think about it. Before going into the “substance” of his Obama criticism, Bush explicitly says that he’s not criticizng Obama–he lies, in other words, about the very premise of what he’s saying. He then turns to two strawmen: first, that some believe terrorists can be persuaded to embrace nonviolence, and second, that some are advocating “therapy” for terroists.

No one in the administration believes either of those things, and no one has remotely advocated any position remotely resembling these things. “Therapy?” Where in God’s name is he getting that from?

Yes, all politicians use strawmen to make their points. The Times recently held Obama over the coals for the practice. But this is different. Bush has only recently departed the White House, and already he is lobbing egregious lies against his successor. What never ceases to amaze me is the degree to which Republicans misunderstand one of the lessons of Obama’s crushing victory: that the public was fed up with the childish, divisive style of our politics. As this morning proves, no one is more adept at that style than Bush.


Comments

No Comments Yet
Post your comment »
 
Log in for notification options
Comments RSS
 

Post Your Comment

You must be logged in to post a comment

Log in with your True/Slant account.

Previously logged in with Facebook?

Create an account to join True/Slant now.

Facebook users:
Create T/S account with Facebook
 

My T/S Activity Feed

 
     

    About Me

    I live in Washington, D.C., a few blocks away from the White House--hence the title of this blog. In my day job, I'm the associate editor of Democracy: A Journal of Ideas (www.democracyjournal.org). I've written for The Nation, Politico, The New Republic, Mother Jones, and the NY Daily News, among other places. This blog will be about politics and the Red Sox.

    See my profile »
    Followers: 37
    Contributor Since: May 2009
    Location:The Capitol

    What I'm Up To

    • Jared Bernstein profile

      I’ve written a piece for Mother Jones about Jared Bernstein, Obama’s top progressive economic advisor. Is he a token, or does his role signal something broader about the administration’s intentions? Check out the piece here.

       
    • Obama’s first draft

      Barack Obama’s success last fall was unlikely, but did not come out nowhere–he owes a lot to the pioneering work of Cesar Chavez, farm worker organizer of the 1960’s and ’70s. Or so I argue in the latest issue of In These Times. Check it out here.

       
    .<
    • +O
    • +O
    >.