What Is True/Slant?
275+ knowledgeable contributors.
Reporting and insight on news of the moment.
Follow them and join the news conversation.

Jan. 20 2010 - 10:38 am | 596 views | 0 recommendations | 8 comments

Why Scott Brown won

This special election came about because we lost someone very dear to Massachusetts, and to America. Senator Ted Kennedy was a tireless and big-hearted public servant, and for most of my lifetime was a force like no other in this state.  His name will always command the affection and respect by the people of Massachusetts, and the same goes for his wife Vicki.  There’s no replacing a man like that, but tonight I honor his memory, and I pledge my very best to be a worthy successor. ~ Scott Brown

This is why Scott Brown won.  He’s a guy who can treat his opponents with respect.  He was out on the campaign trail shaking hands, meeting people, and trying to connect with the voters in Massachusetts.  Unlike his opponent, he was able to skillfully run a positive campaign that nevertheless found its strength in discontent and anger.  Unlike Sarah Palin and other Republicans these days, he did not have to resort to anger and conspiracy theories and other silly tactics; he did not have to go out and kiss the talk-radio pundits’ behinds; he did not stoop to pettiness or name-calling.  He was a class act, and the voters respected that.  Maybe that’s entirely personality politics, but it is the right kind of personality politics.  Brown proved that he could speak to ordinary Americans without putting up a facade.  And ordinary Americans appreciated that.

Rick Ungar is also correct – this was a decision by many in Massachusetts to stick to their own healthcare system without adopting an expensive federal system as well.  But fundamentally I think this was about respect.  Martha Coakley showed voters that she felt entitled to “Kennedy’s seat” and didn’t care whether or not they agreed with her.  She ran a contemptuous campaign that in the end disrespected the very people she needed to elect her.  And she lost because of it.

Reading too much into this victory will result in Republican overreach, and a misunderstanding of the popularity of Republican policy ideas.  It’s a trap both parties are vulnerable to at this point.  As Nate Silver points out, if the Democratic candidate had simply been a better candidate this would have gone the other way – healthcare reform or no.


One T/S Member Comment Called Out, 8 Total Comments
Post your comment »
  1. collapse expand

    Mr. Kain,

    I am disagreeing with anything that you wrote but I think that there is an additional dynamic. Both candidates were basically conservatives, one was a bright, engaging individual who understood how a political campaign is run while the other was not. Given a choice between two conservatives, it is not hard to figure out which would get the most votes.

  2. collapse expand

    Often the most simple answer is the correct one. It appears that Mass. liked Scott Brown and didn’t Martha Coakley.

  3. collapse expand

    That’s a very interesting analysis. The big question is: Is it an isolated event or could this type of campaign become more widespread for the next election cycle?

  4. collapse expand

    Or maybe Bay Staters are just in love with the idea of a lot of dead, uninsured poor people. Maybe they want them delivered to their doorsteps, so that they can have a rollicking good time defiling the bodies.

Log in for notification options
Comments RSS

Post Your Comment

You must be logged in to post a comment

Log in with your True/Slant account.

Previously logged in with Facebook?

Create an account to join True/Slant now.

Facebook users:
Create T/S account with Facebook

My T/S Activity Feed


    About Me

    I am a free-lance writer and blogger. I write at The League of Ordinary Gentlemen, The Washington Examiner, and occasionally elsewhere. Thanks for stopping by and feel free to email me or comment in the combox.

    See my profile »
    Followers: 147
    Contributor Since: October 2009

    What I'm Up To

    • I also write at…

      bowler hat

    • Follow me on….

    • +O
    • +O