What Is True/Slant?
275+ knowledgeable contributors.
Reporting and insight on news of the moment.
Follow them and join the news conversation.
 

Oct. 24 2009 - 3:51 pm | 27 views | 1 recommendation | 2 comments

Interesting fact of the day: Insurance companies exempt from antitrust laws

This really doesn’t come as a huge surprise, but it turns out that health insurance providers are exempt from federal antitrust laws.  From NPR:

It was Congress, after all, that in 1945 overrode a Supreme Court ruling that the insurance industry was indeed part of interstate commerce and thus subject to federal antitrust laws. Lawmakers that year passed the McCarran-Ferguson Act; the law has ever since shielded insurance firms from federal prosecution for price fixing, bid rigging and carving out protected markets.

This week, Senate Judiciary Committee Chairman Patrick Leahy declared the time had come to do away with that protection.

“The antitrust laws exist to protect consumers, but also to promote competition,” he said. “You remove the antitrust laws, you don’t protect consumers, and you don’t promote competition.”

Anyone who doubts that the current market isn’t competitive need only look at the numbers.  In 39 states, two health insurers control at least half the market, while in nine states, one insurer controls at least three-quarters of the market.  There is no way for customers to purchase health insurance across state lines, and even if there was, the tax-exempt status of employer-provided benefits means most consumers don’t have any direct say in their insurance choices to begin with.

I’m all in favor of repealing McCarran-Freguson, but as long as interstate competition is restricted, and the tax-exemption on benefits remains in place, the move will be largely symbolic.

Another thing to note: this sort of deregulation may not lead to “busted-up” health insurers.  Quite possibly it will actually lead to fewer, and bigger, insurers.  The difference is, they’ll be competing against one another far more than they are now.  Think of it like the supermarket industry.  Once upon a time you only had one, maybe two grocers in a medium-sized city.  They didn’t compete much, even if they were small operations.  Now you have massive corporate grocery chains – but they’re competing quite heavily for customers.   Health insurance would look very similar to this if it were deregulated.  And that would be a good thing for costs and consumers.


Comments

2 Total Comments
Post your comment »
 
  1. collapse expand

    Hmmm, it seems like you are discussing the kind of vigorous competition that took place between American car companies in the 70’s. That worked out very well for the American car consumer.

    Insurance is a commodity that responds differently to competition than groceries. In fact,monopoly is the the most efficient way to offer insurance. In a monopoly, the actuaries can best characterize their risks, and spread the risk the most evenly.
    In civilized countries, the monopolist might be the government; in the US, perhaps a regulated private enterprise.

Log in for notification options
Comments RSS

Post Your Comment

You must be logged in to post a comment

Log in with your True/Slant account.

Previously logged in with Facebook?

Create an account to join True/Slant now.

Facebook users:
Create T/S account with Facebook
 

My T/S Activity Feed

 
     

    About Me

    I am a free-lance writer and blogger. I write at The League of Ordinary Gentlemen, The Washington Examiner, and occasionally elsewhere. Thanks for stopping by and feel free to email me or comment in the combox.

    See my profile »
    Followers: 147
    Contributor Since: October 2009
    Location:USA

    What I'm Up To

    • I also write at…

      bowler hat

       
    • Follow me on….

       
    .<
    • +O
    • +O
    >.