What Is True/Slant?
275+ knowledgeable contributors.
Reporting and insight on news of the moment.
Follow them and join the news conversation.
 

Jul. 10 2009 - 9:50 am | 143 views | 1 recommendation | 4 comments

Scientists aren’t Republicans

Beaker

Image via Wikipedia

An intriguing new set of numbers from the Pew Research Center details American attitudes about science and scientists. In general, the U.S. public has an extremely positive view of the role science plays in our society. 84% say they hold science and scientists in “high regard.” In fact, 70% say that scientists “contribute ‘a lot’ to society’s well-being.” The clergy, by comparison register at 40% for the same question, and lawyers come in at 23%.

But before we go filling our beakers with champagne to toast the enlightenment of the average American Joe and Josephine, the study finds some places where scientists and ordinary citizens still don’t see eye-to-eye.

For instance, just 32% of the American public believe that humans evolved from lower species. 87% of scientists do. Only 49% of the public believes global warming is caused by people, while 84% of scientists do.

Actually, that 49% of Americans now accept global warming as man made shows that scientists (as they should in matters of science, after all) are having a big impact on social attitudes. But does that influence extend into the political arena, too? Is the dwindling of the Republican party in some way connected to what scientists believe?

According to Pew, just 6% of all scientists self-identify as Republicans, and only 9% consider themselves to be ideologically “conservative.” But here again, public perception seems to lag behind the views of the scientists themselves:

For its part, the public does not perceive scientists as a particularly liberal group. When asked whether they think of scientists as liberal, conservative or neither in particular, nearly two-thirds (64%) chose the latter option.

56% of scientists themselves, however, self-identify as “liberal”, and 35% say that they are politically “moderate.”


Comments

2 T/S Member Comments Called Out, 4 Total Comments
Post your comment »
 
  1. collapse expand

    As I read this I kept thinking you could easily swap out the word scientist for blacks where the GOP is concerned.

  2. collapse expand

    Well just the unrelenting shrinking of the GOP. The GOP should hang up a sign that says “….need not apply”

    Your thread today is just yet another example.

  3. collapse expand

    Gotcha. Certainly, scientists were not entirely welcome in Republican circles during the Bush years.

Log in for notification options
Comments RSS

Post Your Comment

You must be logged in to post a comment

Log in with your True/Slant account.

Previously logged in with Facebook?

Create an account to join True/Slant now.

Facebook users:
Create T/S account with Facebook
 

My T/S Activity Feed

 
     

    About Me

    I've published two novels: The Secrets of the Camera Obscura (Chronicle Books), and The Third Eye (Nan A. Talese/Doubleday). I'm currently working as a journalist for AOL's Sphere. For the past three years I also spouted political opinion for AOL's Political Machine, which I also helped edit. My non-fiction has appeared in places like Men's Vogue, The Wall Street Journal Magazine, USA Today, Newsday, Travel + Leisure, GQ (Spain), and Vanity Fair (Italy). I've dabbled with short stories, publishing in Nerve and a few small journals.

    The other half of my split personality finds me playing a variety of instruments for a variety of bands, and writing songs for film soundtracks.

    See my profile »
    Followers: 261
    Contributor Since: October 2008
    Location:The Ponzi State

    What I'm Up To

    Finishing screenplay

    In the home stretch now of a screenplay version of my first novel, The Secrets of the Camera Obscura. camera-obscura1