What Is True/Slant?
275+ knowledgeable contributors.
Reporting and insight on news of the moment.
Follow them and join the news conversation.
 

Apr. 17 2010 - 10:31 pm | 1,813 views | 1 recommendation | 9 comments

IBM’s Crime Prediction Tech makes Profiling seem like Child’s Play

Minority Report wasn’t a great movie, but it did get people talking about what might happen if we actually could predict who was going to commit a crime, perhaps even before the future-perp knew it was going to happen. The movie packaged this possibility in a far-fetched way, involving a hot tub full of comatose people with pre-cognitive abilities plugged into an elaborate pinball machine. How silly.

Thing is, the hard working folks at IBM didn’t think it was so silly. Rather than a mere Hollywood fantasy designed to stoke our fears, predicting crime had “profit center” written all over it for the technology behemoth.  Its Analytics Division has spent more than $12 billion in research and development to gin up a marketable crime prediction software package–and they’ve managed to do exactly that.  Here’s a quote from Deepak Advani, vice president of ‘predictive analytics’ at IBM:

Predictive analytics gives government organizations worldwide a highly-sophisticated and intelligent source to create safer communities by identifying, predicting, responding to and preventing criminal activities. It gives the criminal justice system the ability to draw upon the wealth of data available to detect patterns, make reliable projections and then take the appropriate action in real time to combat crime and protect citizens. Gizmodo, April 14, 2010

The first major government customer for this software was the Ministry of Justice in the United Kingdom, and now IBM has found a big U.S. customer in the Florida State Department of Juvenile Justice. The Department will reportedly use the software to predict which wayward youngsters will commit the next crime, so “interventions” can be implemented post haste.

This story isn’t going to end well.  It begins with statements like the one above from Mr. Advani, peppered with phrases  like “detect patterns” and “make reliable projections”–the sorts of phrases that seem from the get go to promise an eventual infringement of rights, and the inevitable royal screwing of the innocent.   

If you have any doubt just how big a business IBM intends for this to become, check out these numbers from Yahoo Finance, no doubt pulled directly from an IBM press release:

IBM has assembled 4,000 analytics consultants with industry expertise, and opened a network of seven analytics centers of excellence. Today, IBM is working with more than 250,000 clients worldwide on predictive analytics, including 22 of the top 24 global commercial banks, 18 of the world’s top 22 telecommunication carriers and 11 of the top 12 U.S. specialty retailers. Yahoo Finance, April 14, 2010

My reaction to where this all will go is similar to that of Gizmodo writer Jesus Diaz, who sums it up well:

First it’s the convicted-but-potentially-recidivistic criminals. Then it’s the potential terrorists. Then it’s everyone of us, in a big database, getting flagged because some combination of factors—travel patterns, credit card activity, relationships, messaging, social activity and everything else—indicate that we may be thinking about doing something against the law.

Once we get into the business of “predicting” what people will do (for the sake of security, of course) and taking action based on the prediction, we’re on the path to denial of personal liberty.  It’s not a question of if this will happen, but when it will.  And I can’t help but find the Florida Department of Juvenile Justice’s use of the system as especially alarming, since the records of those in its sphere of influence could be forever tainted by information that they have the analytically validated potential to commit a serious crime. “Hey kid, you’re an official security risk for the rest of your life! Good luck with that.”

Add to all of this the potential for abuse of such a system, and there’s more than a little in this news to spark concern in the hearts of the reasonable.


Comments

Active Conversation
3 T/S Member Comments Called Out, 9 Total Comments
Post your comment »
 
  1. collapse expand

    I thought this was another 10 years away.

  2. collapse expand

    Aside of issues such as self-fulfilling prophecies, nature/nurture, and so on, what if these methods really did work?

    What would it do to our society? Would we become docile sheep? What would we do with our “pre-criminals”? Where would they fit in to our society? Who would actually fight our terrorists or hard core criminals?

  3. collapse expand

    Don’t worry. Companies like IBM depend exclusively on government contracts for profits.

    As you have probably seen…..State governments are in serious trouble and most likely will be filing for bankruptcy in the next 2-3 years.

  4. collapse expand

    Unless technology has really passed me by, I assume this software has been programmed by HUMANS. What could go wrong?

    This is also interesting in that I just read an article (on the ever-reliable Cracked) that did not think very highly of profiling, as you can tell by the headline:
    http://www.cracked.com/article_18380_the-6-most-statistically-full-shit-professions_p2.html

  5. collapse expand

    IBM helped the Germans in the 30’s too

  6. collapse expand

    We need a new party , nothing extreme, I want to say libertarian but most of those are too extreme now
    too bad most Americans support this stuff as the politicians scare them to death
    both parties play the fear thing almost daily now

Log in for notification options
Comments RSS

Post Your Comment

You must be logged in to post a comment

Log in with your True/Slant account.

Previously logged in with Facebook?

Create an account to join True/Slant now.

Facebook users:
Create T/S account with Facebook
 

My T/S Activity Feed

 
     

    About Me

    I’m a freelance writer, blogger and research wonk who writes about science, technology and the cultural ripples of both. Along my winding career route I've been a public outreach specialist, editor, research analyst, proposal writer and part-time journo. When I’m not writing for True/Slant, I’m blogging about neuroscience and a medley of ‘ologies’ at Neuronarrative.com, and writing freelance for Scientific American Mind.

    See my profile »
    Followers: 157
    Contributor Since: June 2009
    Location:Florida

    What I'm Up To

    .<
    • +O
    • +O
    >.