What Is True/Slant?
275+ knowledgeable contributors.
Reporting and insight on news of the moment.
Follow them and join the news conversation.
 

Mar. 15 2010 - 12:27 pm | 96 views | 0 recommendations | 45 comments

It’s time for the banks to bail out the U.S.

Circuit City

Image by Ed Yourdon via Flickr

Apparently, we may soon need a bailout ourselves. Here’s a NYTimes synopsis of a report from Moody’s Investor Services — which, you will recall, has been castigated for too liberally doling out high ratings to iffy companies and financial instruments:

The United States, Germany and other major economies have moved “substantially” closer to losing their top-notch credit ratings and can not depend solely on economic growth to save them.

The ratings of the Aaa governments — which also include Britain, France, Spain and the Nordic countries — are currently “stable,” Moody’s Investors Service wrote in the report. But, it added, “their ‘distance-to-downgrade’ has in all cases substantially diminished.”

As goes GM, so goes the nation…literally?
Probably not. Still, the mirror image of that popular industrial mantra, “you can’t cut your way to growth,” exists at the country level: “You can’t grow your way to profit.”

If Moody’s is right, then no amount of economic stimulus or business recovery will take care of the deficit. It will require cuts in social services — the kinds of cuts that have caused strikes and protests in Greece, Portugal and other cash-strapped European states.

But I’m not going to claim to have opinions on what Japan (another downgraded-credit country) or Euoprean countries should do. I do, of course, have opinions on what should happen here.

Well, the main fallout of a lowered credit rating is a high cost to borrow money. But who would we borrow the money from? The normal path is to pay higher interest on bonds and such. But how about we start with Goldman, JPMorgan, other banks that got bailed out of their problems, lending money at low rates to the taxpayers who kept them solvent in the first place?

I’m not suggesting that they have enough resources to close the deficit. But morally and symbolically, it could go a long way to mollify anger, no?


Comments

Active Conversation
45 Total Comments
Post your comment »
 
Log in for notification options
Comments RSS

Post Your Comment

You must be logged in to post a comment

Log in with your True/Slant account.

Previously logged in with Facebook?

Create an account to join True/Slant now.

Facebook users:
Create T/S account with Facebook
 

My T/S Activity Feed

 
     

    About Me

    I graduated from Cornell with a degree in child psychology, enough years ago so that all you needed to break into journalism was willingness to starve. I went into business journalism because, in the 60s, the business press was the crusading press, the ones that wrote about environment, race relations, etc. Since then I have worked for Business Week, Chemical Week and, from 1984 through May 2008, BizDay at the New York Times. I remain bored by and ignorant of esoteric financial instruments; I remain fascinated and pretty knowledgeable about management, marketing, environment, all the non-financial aspects of business. But my true passions? Tennis, both playing and watching, and food, both cooking and eating.

    See my profile »
    Followers: 199
    Contributor Since: January 2009
    Location:Manhattan,NY