What Is True/Slant?
275+ knowledgeable contributors.
Reporting and insight on news of the moment.
Follow them and join the news conversation.
 

Dec. 1 2009 - 5:23 pm | 2 views | 0 recommendations | 2 comments

Henderson’s ouster at GM still doesn’t mean that fresh blood is better blood

FORT LAUDERDALE, FL - OCTOBER 08:  Frederick '...

Image by Getty Images via Daylife

Logic, of course, might dictate otherwise. After all, Rick Wagoner, the last GM chief, was a GM lifer, and couldn’t keep the company from going down the tubes. The Obama Adminsitration forced him out in March. It enticed Ed Whitacre, a retired AT&T chief (not exactly the company I’d cite for historically excellent management), to become chairman, but replaced Wagoner as chief with Fritz Henderson, another GM lifer. Apparently, Whitacre and the board — and probably the folks in Washington — are disappointed in Henderson, too. He got ousted Tuesday afternoon. Whitacre is acting CEO while they look for another new chief.

So clearly, insiders can’t save this company, right? Fresh blood is needed, right?

Not so fast. There’s an old saying — water and cyanide kills you, water and arsenic kills you, water and strychnine kills you — aha! Water kills.

The fact is, being an insider is no guarantee of competence — but it should not be viewed as a dealbreaker. Granted, Alan Mulally was an outsider, and has done wonders with Ford. But in contrast, look at Xerox. It brought Rick Thoman in from IBM, and he nearly destroyed that company. It took Anne Mulcahy, a veteran who knew the troops and were trusted by them, to get the company back on track. Or how about Corning? When it almost tanked after the telecom implosion of 2002, it brought Jamie Houghton back from retirement, and he brought the company back from the brink.

I’m not saying Henderson should not have been ousted. From what I hear, GM’s come up with a stellar product line and its ad and marketing campaign seems to be good. But I don’t know whether he blew the chances to profitably divest various GM product lines, or whether he was too wishywashy in his negotiations with the unions.

But chances are good that the board isn’t questioning what he has or has not done, but rather the apparent lack of aggressiveness with which he has made his moves. It may not want different action, it wants faster action.

And maybe it should. But that doesn’t necessarily mean it needs to bring in someone whose main claim to the job is outsider status. Look at Bob Nardelli — He was great at General Electric, an absolute disaster at Home Depot. How’s he doing at Chrysler? I don’t know — but whether he’s a stellar or dismal chief, I’ll bet it has more to do with his particular style and skills, not his knowledge of cars and Chrysler.


Comments

One T/S Member Comment Called Out, 2 Total Comments
Post your comment »
 
  1. collapse expand

    It would be nice to have a car guy in charge, someone who knows a good car when he sees one and knows how to build them. One of the big problems with GM is crappy factories built on the old model. A visit on the net reveals factories in Europe and Japan that are wonders and can make multiple versions and models on the same line.

  2. collapse expand

    Which, of course, mitigates in favor of promotion from within. I’d say that maybe they should hire someone from Toyota — but that company has finally had a bunch of its own problems this last year.

Log in for notification options
Comments RSS

Post Your Comment

You must be logged in to post a comment

Log in with your True/Slant account.

Previously logged in with Facebook?

Create an account to join True/Slant now.

Facebook users:
Create T/S account with Facebook
 

My T/S Activity Feed

 
     

    About Me

    I graduated from Cornell with a degree in child psychology, enough years ago so that all you needed to break into journalism was willingness to starve. I went into business journalism because, in the 60s, the business press was the crusading press, the ones that wrote about environment, race relations, etc. Since then I have worked for Business Week, Chemical Week and, from 1984 through May 2008, BizDay at the New York Times. I remain bored by and ignorant of esoteric financial instruments; I remain fascinated and pretty knowledgeable about management, marketing, environment, all the non-financial aspects of business. But my true passions? Tennis, both playing and watching, and food, both cooking and eating.

    See my profile »
    Followers: 199
    Contributor Since: January 2009
    Location:Manhattan,NY