<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The twenty best films of the 2000&#8217;s</title>
	<atom:link href="http://trueslant.com/childers/2009/11/16/the-twenty-best-films-of-the-00s/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://trueslant.com/childers/2009/11/16/the-twenty-best-films-of-the-00s/</link>
	<description>Politics, Culture, Science, Religion:  It&#039;s all grist for the mill.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 02 Jan 2012 13:58:35 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: There Will Be Blood Wins the Decade &#124; Gossip : thypolls.com</title>
		<link>http://trueslant.com/childers/2009/11/16/the-twenty-best-films-of-the-00s/comment-page-1/#comment-396</link>
		<dc:creator>There Will Be Blood Wins the Decade &#124; Gossip : thypolls.com</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Dec 2009 19:30:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://trueslant.com/childers/?p=1986#comment-396</guid>
		<description>[...] Jonathan Fuhrman: Mediaite, Global Comment, Rolling Stone, IDS News, Zero For Conduct, TV Guide, True Slant, IMDB top rated, Stylus Magazine, The Telegraph, Orlando Sentinel, Moviefone, David Denby: The New [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Jonathan Fuhrman: Mediaite, Global Comment, Rolling Stone, IDS News, Zero For Conduct, TV Guide, True Slant, IMDB top rated, Stylus Magazine, The Telegraph, Orlando Sentinel, Moviefone, David Denby: The New [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: andygeiger</title>
		<link>http://trueslant.com/childers/2009/11/16/the-twenty-best-films-of-the-00s/comment-page-1/#comment-369</link>
		<dc:creator>andygeiger</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 06 Dec 2009 17:39:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://trueslant.com/childers/?p=1986#comment-369</guid>
		<description>Sorry Joseph but this has stuck in my craw (and LOTR marathon is on today.)  i personally hate it when others try to impose their interests on me, so i will be brief and apologize in advance; but as someone once said to me, &quot;if you only ever see one gangster movie, see The Godfather.&quot;  

If you only ever see one medieval fantasy movie, see LOTR (in fact don&#039;t think about seeing any other, they all suck.)  Wizards and elves are really just a side note.  It&#039;s actually a deftly multi-layered story where the main character is Humanity.  The unifying theme is the inability of Man to resist the temptation of power and its inevitable corruption of the soul, and it&#039;s a great story to support the old, oft-dismissed phrase, &quot;The meek shall inherit the Earth.&quot;

I&#039;m tellin ya, there&#039;s more than 11 reasons it won 11 oscars...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sorry Joseph but this has stuck in my craw (and LOTR marathon is on today.)  i personally hate it when others try to impose their interests on me, so i will be brief and apologize in advance; but as someone once said to me, &#8220;if you only ever see one gangster movie, see The Godfather.&#8221;  </p>
<p>If you only ever see one medieval fantasy movie, see LOTR (in fact don&#8217;t think about seeing any other, they all suck.)  Wizards and elves are really just a side note.  It&#8217;s actually a deftly multi-layered story where the main character is Humanity.  The unifying theme is the inability of Man to resist the temptation of power and its inevitable corruption of the soul, and it&#8217;s a great story to support the old, oft-dismissed phrase, &#8220;The meek shall inherit the Earth.&#8221;</p>
<p>I&#8217;m tellin ya, there&#8217;s more than 11 reasons it won 11 oscars&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Marc Flores</title>
		<link>http://trueslant.com/childers/2009/11/16/the-twenty-best-films-of-the-00s/comment-page-1/#comment-351</link>
		<dc:creator>Marc Flores</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Dec 2009 07:06:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://trueslant.com/childers/?p=1986#comment-351</guid>
		<description>Some of my favorites for the 2000s are The Departed, Casino Royale (for making the cheesy Bond movies a little cooler) and Inglorious Basterds.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Some of my favorites for the 2000s are The Departed, Casino Royale (for making the cheesy Bond movies a little cooler) and Inglorious Basterds.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: andygeiger</title>
		<link>http://trueslant.com/childers/2009/11/16/the-twenty-best-films-of-the-00s/comment-page-1/#comment-344</link>
		<dc:creator>andygeiger</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Nov 2009 22:54:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://trueslant.com/childers/?p=1986#comment-344</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;you might be the only person (including the Coens) who’d put Burn After Reading in a top 20 of the 2000s.&lt;/blockquote&gt;

Oops, sorry for the confusion.  If anything, i might be the only person who could never pick just 20 top movies for a whole decade (you are right though, it does make for some lively discussion!)  &lt;i&gt;Children of Men&lt;/i&gt; is an awesome, moving film and so is &lt;i&gt;Monsters, Inc.&lt;/i&gt; - but they are two entirely different animals and to me they defy comparison.  

I can say though that i did like BAR better than NCFOM...   The great casting, the perfect mix of comedy and tragedy, and great one-liners e.g. the scene shared between Clooney and Swinton where George&#039;s character says something to the effect of, &#039;sweetie, sometimes you hammer people too hard&#039;  to which Tilda&#039;s character replies, &quot;I. DO. NOT. HAMMER!!&quot;  Great stuff.  

NCFOM just seemed like another &#039;where&#039;s the loot&#039; movie with a particularly bland macho bullying murderous psycho.  He wasn&#039;t interesting like a Hannibal Lecter, or funny like Jules &amp; Vincent, just blah... i didn&#039;t get it (but then again the whole world was hyperventilating hosannas for that role, so what do i know?)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>you might be the only person (including the Coens) who’d put Burn After Reading in a top 20 of the 2000s.</p></blockquote>
<p>Oops, sorry for the confusion.  If anything, i might be the only person who could never pick just 20 top movies for a whole decade (you are right though, it does make for some lively discussion!)  <i>Children of Men</i> is an awesome, moving film and so is <i>Monsters, Inc.</i> &#8211; but they are two entirely different animals and to me they defy comparison.  </p>
<p>I can say though that i did like BAR better than NCFOM&#8230;   The great casting, the perfect mix of comedy and tragedy, and great one-liners e.g. the scene shared between Clooney and Swinton where George&#8217;s character says something to the effect of, &#8217;sweetie, sometimes you hammer people too hard&#8217;  to which Tilda&#8217;s character replies, &#8220;I. DO. NOT. HAMMER!!&#8221;  Great stuff.  </p>
<p>NCFOM just seemed like another &#8216;where&#8217;s the loot&#8217; movie with a particularly bland macho bullying murderous psycho.  He wasn&#8217;t interesting like a Hannibal Lecter, or funny like Jules &amp; Vincent, just blah&#8230; i didn&#8217;t get it (but then again the whole world was hyperventilating hosannas for that role, so what do i know?)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jaymichaelsmith</title>
		<link>http://trueslant.com/childers/2009/11/16/the-twenty-best-films-of-the-00s/comment-page-1/#comment-343</link>
		<dc:creator>jaymichaelsmith</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Nov 2009 19:40:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://trueslant.com/childers/?p=1986#comment-343</guid>
		<description>I didn&#039;t see any mention of it, and I don&#039;t think I would have ever heard about it except for a buddy in film school insisting that I see it, but I feel like the Assassination of Jesse James is one of the most overlooked movies of the past decade. It features Roger Deakins (who was also the DP for No Country) at his finest and is one of three movies Andrew Dominik has directed.

The only contention is that its a little long; but if you&#039;ve got a couple hours, it is a wonderful character (instead of a regular shoot &#039;em up...) study that is visually unparalleled. Stellar performances from both Casey Affleck and Brad Pitt - I think one Pitt&#039;s best. Had to give it a shout!

**SOOO glad Children of Men is on this list. . . Great movie!**</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I didn&#8217;t see any mention of it, and I don&#8217;t think I would have ever heard about it except for a buddy in film school insisting that I see it, but I feel like the Assassination of Jesse James is one of the most overlooked movies of the past decade. It features Roger Deakins (who was also the DP for No Country) at his finest and is one of three movies Andrew Dominik has directed.</p>
<p>The only contention is that its a little long; but if you&#8217;ve got a couple hours, it is a wonderful character (instead of a regular shoot &#8216;em up&#8230;) study that is visually unparalleled. Stellar performances from both Casey Affleck and Brad Pitt &#8211; I think one Pitt&#8217;s best. Had to give it a shout!</p>
<p>**SOOO glad Children of Men is on this list. . . Great movie!**</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Joseph Childers</title>
		<link>http://trueslant.com/childers/2009/11/16/the-twenty-best-films-of-the-00s/comment-page-1/#comment-342</link>
		<dc:creator>Joseph Childers</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Nov 2009 19:14:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://trueslant.com/childers/?p=1986#comment-342</guid>
		<description>Haven&#039;t seen Sunshine yet.  I&#039;m not sure about best-of-decade, but Moon would definitely be in my top films of this year list.  I feel like it&#039;s getting criminally overlooked.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Haven&#8217;t seen Sunshine yet.  I&#8217;m not sure about best-of-decade, but Moon would definitely be in my top films of this year list.  I feel like it&#8217;s getting criminally overlooked.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Paul Tassi</title>
		<link>http://trueslant.com/childers/2009/11/16/the-twenty-best-films-of-the-00s/comment-page-1/#comment-341</link>
		<dc:creator>Paul Tassi</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Nov 2009 18:39:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://trueslant.com/childers/?p=1986#comment-341</guid>
		<description>I disagree with a lot of it, but just seeing Memento on there makes it all worthwhile. 

If you&#039;re a sci-fi guy, I would submit Sunshine and Moon for consideration as well.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I disagree with a lot of it, but just seeing Memento on there makes it all worthwhile. </p>
<p>If you&#8217;re a sci-fi guy, I would submit Sunshine and Moon for consideration as well.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Joseph Childers</title>
		<link>http://trueslant.com/childers/2009/11/16/the-twenty-best-films-of-the-00s/comment-page-1/#comment-340</link>
		<dc:creator>Joseph Childers</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Nov 2009 18:22:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://trueslant.com/childers/?p=1986#comment-340</guid>
		<description>RE: City of God, my enjoyment of it was tainted by seeing Pixote (1981) first, a much darker, less slick film that covers the same ground.  Though, really, they&#039;re both really good movies.

Seeing the awfulness-on-stilts that was Bruno probably knocked Borat down a notch or two in my mind, which is unfair, I&#039;ll admit.

I haven&#039;t seen Half Nelson, though I&#039;ve never heard anyone recommend it as a great movie - just as a great performance.

Haven&#039;t seen This is England.

I like Before Sunrise a lot more than the sequel.

As I said to someone earlier today, if everything before Daniel Day Lewis puts the napkin on his head was as good as what went before it, There Will Be Blood would probably be my number one.  Alas, it turns into a silly cartoon for the last third.

And as far as LOTR - fantasy just bores the daylights of me.  I&#039;m a sci-fi guy all the way.  You can keep your wizards and elves and whatnot.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>RE: City of God, my enjoyment of it was tainted by seeing Pixote (1981) first, a much darker, less slick film that covers the same ground.  Though, really, they&#8217;re both really good movies.</p>
<p>Seeing the awfulness-on-stilts that was Bruno probably knocked Borat down a notch or two in my mind, which is unfair, I&#8217;ll admit.</p>
<p>I haven&#8217;t seen Half Nelson, though I&#8217;ve never heard anyone recommend it as a great movie &#8211; just as a great performance.</p>
<p>Haven&#8217;t seen This is England.</p>
<p>I like Before Sunrise a lot more than the sequel.</p>
<p>As I said to someone earlier today, if everything before Daniel Day Lewis puts the napkin on his head was as good as what went before it, There Will Be Blood would probably be my number one.  Alas, it turns into a silly cartoon for the last third.</p>
<p>And as far as LOTR &#8211; fantasy just bores the daylights of me.  I&#8217;m a sci-fi guy all the way.  You can keep your wizards and elves and whatnot.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ben Lebovitz</title>
		<link>http://trueslant.com/childers/2009/11/16/the-twenty-best-films-of-the-00s/comment-page-1/#comment-339</link>
		<dc:creator>Ben Lebovitz</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Nov 2009 18:09:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://trueslant.com/childers/?p=1986#comment-339</guid>
		<description>Yeah, city of god... So much wrong with this list I don&#039;t know where to start.  Wet hot AMS, but no Borat?  Errrrr, ok, I guess.  There will be blood as an also-ran?  how about This is England?  Kill Bill?  Half Nelson? Hero and/or House of Flying Daggers???  Before Sunset gets a mention, for serious???  Triplets of Belville?  Lord of the Rings????  

Ok, I&#039;m getting my undies in a knot, so I&#039;ll stop.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yeah, city of god&#8230; So much wrong with this list I don&#8217;t know where to start.  Wet hot AMS, but no Borat?  Errrrr, ok, I guess.  There will be blood as an also-ran?  how about This is England?  Kill Bill?  Half Nelson? Hero and/or House of Flying Daggers???  Before Sunset gets a mention, for serious???  Triplets of Belville?  Lord of the Rings????  </p>
<p>Ok, I&#8217;m getting my undies in a knot, so I&#8217;ll stop.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Joseph Childers</title>
		<link>http://trueslant.com/childers/2009/11/16/the-twenty-best-films-of-the-00s/comment-page-1/#comment-337</link>
		<dc:creator>Joseph Childers</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Nov 2009 17:22:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://trueslant.com/childers/?p=1986#comment-337</guid>
		<description>Just added Bread and Tulips and Death at a Funeral to my queue. Thanks for the recommendations.

Andy, you might be the only person (including the Coens) who’d put Burn After Reading in a top 20 of the 2000s.  ;)  But regarding that and Shortbus’s mention of O’Brother Where Art Thou, I lean much more towards the Coen thrillers and dramas (Fargo, No Country, Blood Simple, Miller’s Crossing) than their comedies. I even find them funnier overall.

I can guarantee you there’s no point system. You won’t a bigger skeptic of quantifying art than me. I just do it because it’s fun to look back on the decade, not to mention it’s a good conversation/argument starter. Plus, it makes you think about why you like certain things more than others and how to put that into words. It could have just as easily been labeled “My Personal Subjective Favorite Films In Order, Sort of”, but I assume that’s the case with any best of list and so I find such qualifiers redundant.

As far as the tentpoles, I feel kind of bad not putting more action movies like Dark Knight, Minority Report, Iron Man, or the Bourne sequels b/c I certainly enjoyed seeing them. I probably just had less to say about them.

As far as the decade being sorta lame, movie-wise, keep in mind that I started film school in 1999, which is now considered one of the greatest years for movies ever. And so is 1994. After that decade, it’s hard not to disappoint.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Just added Bread and Tulips and Death at a Funeral to my queue. Thanks for the recommendations.</p>
<p>Andy, you might be the only person (including the Coens) who’d put Burn After Reading in a top 20 of the 2000s.  <img src='http://trueslant.com/childers/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';)' class='wp-smiley' />   But regarding that and Shortbus’s mention of O’Brother Where Art Thou, I lean much more towards the Coen thrillers and dramas (Fargo, No Country, Blood Simple, Miller’s Crossing) than their comedies. I even find them funnier overall.</p>
<p>I can guarantee you there’s no point system. You won’t a bigger skeptic of quantifying art than me. I just do it because it’s fun to look back on the decade, not to mention it’s a good conversation/argument starter. Plus, it makes you think about why you like certain things more than others and how to put that into words. It could have just as easily been labeled “My Personal Subjective Favorite Films In Order, Sort of”, but I assume that’s the case with any best of list and so I find such qualifiers redundant.</p>
<p>As far as the tentpoles, I feel kind of bad not putting more action movies like Dark Knight, Minority Report, Iron Man, or the Bourne sequels b/c I certainly enjoyed seeing them. I probably just had less to say about them.</p>
<p>As far as the decade being sorta lame, movie-wise, keep in mind that I started film school in 1999, which is now considered one of the greatest years for movies ever. And so is 1994. After that decade, it’s hard not to disappoint.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

