What Is True/Slant?
275+ knowledgeable contributors.
Reporting and insight on news of the moment.
Follow them and join the news conversation.
 

Oct. 19 2009 - 1:26 pm | 35 views | 3 recommendations | 2 comments

Should you take your kids to see Where the Wild Things Are?

WTWTA

Wait – you actually think I’m stupid enough to answer that for you? That’s your job, parents. I’m not about to step in that briar patch.

But…

I do want to throw in my two cents after seeing the film on Friday, because I feel like I saw a different movie than a lot of critics. To hear them tell it, Where the Wild Things Are is a movie about children, but definitely not for children. It’s clearly too dark and depressing for the tots to handle, and it might be best for the little ones to sit this one out.

Well…

I don’t get it. OK, if you’ve got a toddler that wets themselves in fear when Big Bird walks onscreen or turns into a hysterical mess when they sit on Santa’s lap, then, yes, they should probably take a raincheck. But you’d probably know well enough not to take them to see a movie that has monsters twice the size of the protagonist running around in the trailer, anyway, right? Otherwise, the fuss is way out of proportion to the material, and I’m afraid it will make a lot of kids miss out on an incredible movie experience because adults are doing them the favor of being afraid for them.

Where The Wild Things Are

Somethin’ filled up
my heart with nothin’,
someone told me not to cry.

First of all, it’s not that dark. Unlike a ton of children’s classics (Charlotte’s Web, Old Yeller, Harry Potter, Where the Red Fern Grows, Bride to Terabithia, The Red Pony, Watership Down, etc.), no one even dies in it. It does have an intense range of emotions, veering wildly from joy to sadness to fear, but so does childhood itself. If all kids are only introduced to entertainment that’s all sweetness and light, then they’re going to feel like a freak when they experience all the other emotions. There’s so much falseness we’re fed in popular culture – children, especially – that we feel a sense of relief when the truth is reflected back to us. Now, that truth, if it’s worth anything, is probably going to hurt. But that uncomfortable awareness is much more appropriate and rewarding than a comfortable lie; the lie, in this case, being that childhood is nothing but sugar and smiles and clever comebacks to adults.

But now that I’m older,
my heart’s colder,
and I can see that it’s a lie.

Second, I think the movie is going to be remembered as classic of the genre, and I’d be pretty sad as a kid if I missed that experience. I can’t imagine I’ll ever have a movie trigger the emotions that E.T. did for me when I saw it in the theater when I was 8 years old. I only wish I could feel that now. Now, I’m not saying WTWTA is that good or that it’s perfect by any means; there are plenty of lulls and missteps and things that could be tightened here and there. But Spike Jonze said he set out to make a film that showed what it felt like to be 9 years old, and by that metric, it’s safe to say he nailed it. The film is masterful at capturing that awkward time when you still want all the perks of being a kid but you’re getting tired of the downsides. You’re beginning to be forced to draw bright lines in your life; the choices between fun or freedom, autonomy or mothering, respect or protection start cropping up constantly. There aren’t many movies that deal with this time this well, and for that reason alone, I’d take my kids to see it. Plus, they’ll get to see a career performance by James Gandolfini before they’re old enough to borrow your Sopranos DVDs.

wtwta4

Children wake up,
hold your mistake up,
before they turn the summer into dust.

Third, I’d think that as a parent, I’d want to err on the side of challenging my kids, rather than placating them. There are worse things in the world than letting a kid get bored – like letting them watch the Disney Channel, for one. I’d much rather my child be exposed to – gasp! – actual emotions than to let them be brainwashed by a torrent of commercials and tweener sitcoms, and all the narcissistic materialism and inappropriate sexuality they promote. I always loved watching parents take their kids to MOMA in New York. There was no worrying about what was over their head or whether they might get bored or any nonsense like that. It was just a parent asking their child “Well, what do you think of that?” Is it too much to ask that we have the same attitude towards movies? Why do we assume kids can only enjoy what’s dull, dumb and loud?
disney awful

If the children don’t grow up,
our bodies get bigger but our hearts get torn up.
We’re just a million little gods causin’ rain storms turnin’ every good thing to
rust.

I worried for a long time that the [famously good] trailer was misleading, that the Arcade Fire song was just catnip for the young adults, and the final product would be way more sappy and silly than implied. But while it was a good deal more kinetic than the movie, the lyrics and emotional coloring of the song and trailer ended up being a good clue to what the movie contained. Growing up is hard. You have to give up some things. But refusing to do so is much worse, and you’ll end up hurting the ones you love if you don’t. So you might as well start now.

I guess we’ll just have to adjust.

Where The Wild Things Are


Comments

2 Total Comments
Post your comment »
 
  1. collapse expand

    Well you sold me the ticket JC…

    I thought it was a cute, imaginative romp about childhood growing pains full of whimsy and peculiarity; but i think the film could best serve to inspire children, who are actually going through the kind of experiences central to the film’s theme. Like you say, they need to be challenged creatively and emotionally as opposed to conditioned (or, how did you put it? “brainwashed by a torrent of commercials and tweener sitcoms, and all the narcissistic materialism and inappropriate sexuality they promote.” – AMEN.) To posit that the movie is primarily for adults is arrogant/dismissive at least and child neglect at worst.

    Who are these critics of which you speak? Protecting the guilty are we?

Log in for notification options
Comments RSS

Post Your Comment

You must be logged in to post a comment

Log in with your True/Slant account.

Previously logged in with Facebook?

Create an account to join True/Slant now.

Facebook users:
Create T/S account with Facebook
 

My T/S Activity Feed

 
     

    About Me

    As a young boy growing up in a small rural town in western North Carolina, I had one simple dream: getting the hell out of a small rural town in western North Carolina.

    Kidding, kidding! I love the South. Where else on Earth could produce both Flannery O'Connor and Lil' Wayne?

    But I have always felt the pull of the big city, and the promise of action, adventure and all-night bodegas that come with it. I've lived in San Francisco, LA, and New York, and I've been lucky enough to work as a television editor for such networks as VH1, BET, CMT, Lifetime and The Travel Channel. I enjoy documentaries more than anything, though, and I'm currently doing research for my own: an investigation of that ongoing American obscenity we call the Drug War.

    I'm also a writer forever straddling the line between fiction and nonfiction. Screenplays, skits, polemics, plays, blogs, short stories and personal essays: don't make me pick just one, I love 'em all. On True/Slant you'll find me in scavenger mode, digging up bits of interest from all corners of the internet (it has corners, right?). From politics to pop culture, from the truly idiotic to the truly inspired - it's all grist for the mill.

    See my profile »
    Followers: 148
    Contributor Since: February 2009
    Location:Brooklyn, NY