What Is True/Slant?
275+ knowledgeable contributors.
Reporting and insight on news of the moment.
Follow them and join the news conversation.
 

Dec. 16 2009 - 8:25 am | 131 views | 1 recommendation | 5 comments

New York Times Will Fire 24 Final Employees To Hit Its Goal Of 100 By Christmas

The New York Times building in New York, NY ac...

Image via Wikipedia

Pink slips for Christmas. That’s what 24 New York Times employees are facing this week as the paper winds down to its goal of buying out 100 employees by year’s end.

It’s been a hell of a fall for anyone connected to the Times, staff or freelance. I earned one-third of my income from the paper in 2007 and 2008, writing for a suburban section since decimated, as well as covering business, real estate and other issues for them. My final story for them of 2009 runs tomorrow in the Business section, ironically enough, a piece about how small businesses around the country are dealing with slow, late or non-paying clients.

I rarely even pitch my editors there anymore, so few are the assignments and so long the wait to run a story — which is only when we freelancers get paid. Now, with so many other publications slashing their budgets, the line-up for the Times’ remaining assignments already stretches, for one section editor I know, into April.

My partner works there and we spent the fall discussing whether or not to take the buyout. He did not.

It’s hard to overstate, for those outside journalism, the allure for many staffers of working for the Times: decent pay, a union with clout, smart, tough colleagues, international prestige, interesting work, the chance to move around internally from one section to another, even from covering Queens to a posting in Africa. It’s a bit like joining the foreign service. The deal quickly becomes clear; you subsume your ego into the service of a large, slow-moving, politically liberal organization, a place where confrontation is often considered declasse, and in return for hard work, you received the assurance — often face to face in the biannual “throw things at Bill” all-staff meetings (that’s Bill Keller, the editor in chief) — that you had a place there.

The place has changed, deeply and for good, insiders say. Some foreign correspondents who could rely on the services of their own car and driver have lost this privilege. Last year, every union employee took a five percent pay cut to help the company stay afloat, in return for 10 furlough days. The mood this week, as might be imagined, is grim and scared. Even two or three years ago, a talented Times editor or writer could practically write their ticket to the next terrific gig. No longer; 24,000 print journalists were canned in 2008 and every week has thrust more unemployed competitors, many of them also in Manhattan, into a crowded and deeply competitive marketplace.

I’ll be competing with some of these people for freelance work and, as I send out my resume occasionally for a staff job, that as well.

I wish them the best.


Comments

Active Conversation
One T/S Member Comment Called Out, 5 Total Comments
Post your comment »
 
  1. collapse expand

    This makes me so sad, for the state of the paper and its employees. A layoff is about the worst Christmas present you can get.

  2. collapse expand

    Jen, I agree. The only thing that has made it tolerable, as many were employees of 20 or even 30+ years, was a buyout package allowing them to leave with a full year’s salary or more. Even in a terrible economy, that’s a much softer landing than many-to-most workers ever get.

  3. collapse expand

    I’m in a somewhat related business, Caitlin, and I’m looking forward to reading your NYTimes article that will appear tomorrow. My own improvised strategies for dealing with late and just-not-paying clients isn’t working as well as I’d like. Hard times, getting harder.

  4. collapse expand

    Without good software the hardware is useless. Without reporters papers become circulars. Right now the readers are keeping the paper afloat so it’s a shame they will get less while the Times struggles with their advertising loss. Hopefully someone will find a new business model for newspapers since they are vital to a democracy.

Log in for notification options
Comments RSS

Post Your Comment

You must be logged in to post a comment

Log in with your True/Slant account.

Previously logged in with Facebook?

Create an account to join True/Slant now.

Facebook users:
Create T/S account with Facebook
 

My T/S Activity Feed

 
     

    About Me

    Former reporter and feature writer for the Globe and Mail, Montreal Gazette and the New York Daily News. Winner of a Canadian National Magazine Award (humor) about -- what else -- my divorce. I've been writing frequently for The New York Times since 1990 on almost any subject you can think of -- yup, I'm a generalist. Author of "Blown Away: American Women and Guns" (Pocket Books 2004). Canadian born, raised and formally educated, I've lived in New York since 1989.

    See my profile »
    Followers: 249
    Contributor Since: June 2009
    Location:NYC suburb

    What I'm Up To

    About

    I’m writing my second book, a memoir for Portfolio/Penguin, of working retail in a suburban mall for more than two years. My 11 Reporting Tips from daily newspaper veterans appears in the May issue of The Writer magazine.

    I also coach fellow writers and edit their work.