Comments on: Settle down, Clarence

By: andylevinson

andylevinson — Thu, 29 Oct 2009 19:30:21 +0000

The school officlas should be stripped searched in public

By: Afi Scruggs

Afi Scruggs — Fri, 26 Jun 2009 14:35:22 +0000

I’m talking to Clarence,too. Stop by my site and see what I have to say.

By: Brian In NYC

Brian In NYC — Thu, 25 Jun 2009 19:07:31 +0000

Everything about Clarence is creepy, especially the fact that he holds a life time appointment.

By: Austin Considine

Austin Considine — Thu, 25 Jun 2009 18:52:47 +0000

I don’t like to make mountains out of mole hills. Neither do I want to be libelous. But it’s pretty creepy, you gotta admit.

By: Brian In NYC

Brian In NYC — Thu, 25 Jun 2009 18:34:19 +0000

Great minds think alike Austin: I posted the following on my blog when I got the NY Times alert:

”

Supreme Court Rules Strip-Search of Girl Was Unconstitutional

Upholding a lower court decision, the Supreme Court ruled
that officials at an Arizona public school violated a
13-year-old student’s constitutional rights when they
subjected her to a search of her bra and underpants for
prescription and over-the-counter drugs that were forbidden
by school rules. But the court said that the officials should
be immune from liability in the case and that lower courts
should decide whether the school district could be held
liable.

Anyone care to guess who the one dissenter was?”