<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: 7 Million Twitter accounts and the sounds of silence</title>
	<atom:link href="http://trueslant.com/andreaitis/2009/06/06/7-million-twitter-accounts-and-the-sounds-of-silence/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://trueslant.com/andreaitis/2009/06/06/7-million-twitter-accounts-and-the-sounds-of-silence/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 26 Aug 2011 19:16:40 -0400</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: mrsandyclark</title>
		<link>http://trueslant.com/andreaitis/2009/06/06/7-million-twitter-accounts-and-the-sounds-of-silence/comment-page-1/#comment-53</link>
		<dc:creator>mrsandyclark</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 06 Jun 2009 21:35:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://trueslant.com/andreaitis/?p=1128#comment-53</guid>
		<description>Andreaitis,

I follow you more to learn about tech than for any other reason.  I am not exactly tech-savvy as you know by now.  I am more of a &quot;passive blogger&quot;...Oh, wait...that would be a lie.  There are so many ways to communicate these days.

Twitter is one I have no interest in, as you are limited by the number of characters you can use.  I usually put some thought into posts that I respond to, whether it is my own research and I always read the embedded source material.  There is one author on here that I notified that her embedded source material didn&#039;t work.  Eventually, I posted my comments anyhow and was lambasted because I missed her point entirely.  If she had fixed the embedded source material, that would have never happened.  I kind of felt had.  The next time I was presented with a similar situation, I notified the author and she fixed it and thanked me.  Then, I felt comfortable commenting.  A lesson you only have to learn once.

You and Ryan Sager I follow as I learn things.  I know that there are other products and forms of communication that are out there that may work for me.  The others that I follow cover topics that I am usually well versed on or have to do little research to engage their post.  If I read others&#039; comments, it is usually accidental.  I don&#039;t miss the nastiness of The Political Machine.  I prefer to engage the author and their topic without having it tainted by strong personalities just looking for an argument.

Which reminds me that I have an abandoned account on here that I made under a different screen name that I should delete.  Which means I can get rid of the extra screen name as well.  I like only having one.  I&#039;ll delete that today in the hopes it doesn&#039;t screw this one up somehow.

So, as you can see, Twitter and I are not a good fit.  I&#039;m pretty sure I have used more than 140 characters.  How frustrating that would be for someone like me?  I&#039;m glad I never set up an account with them.  Damn, I&#039;ll bet I am up to at least 150 characters.

Sandy</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Andreaitis,</p>
<p>I follow you more to learn about tech than for any other reason.  I am not exactly tech-savvy as you know by now.  I am more of a &#8220;passive blogger&#8221;&#8230;Oh, wait&#8230;that would be a lie.  There are so many ways to communicate these days.</p>
<p>Twitter is one I have no interest in, as you are limited by the number of characters you can use.  I usually put some thought into posts that I respond to, whether it is my own research and I always read the embedded source material.  There is one author on here that I notified that her embedded source material didn&#8217;t work.  Eventually, I posted my comments anyhow and was lambasted because I missed her point entirely.  If she had fixed the embedded source material, that would have never happened.  I kind of felt had.  The next time I was presented with a similar situation, I notified the author and she fixed it and thanked me.  Then, I felt comfortable commenting.  A lesson you only have to learn once.</p>
<p>You and Ryan Sager I follow as I learn things.  I know that there are other products and forms of communication that are out there that may work for me.  The others that I follow cover topics that I am usually well versed on or have to do little research to engage their post.  If I read others&#8217; comments, it is usually accidental.  I don&#8217;t miss the nastiness of The Political Machine.  I prefer to engage the author and their topic without having it tainted by strong personalities just looking for an argument.</p>
<p>Which reminds me that I have an abandoned account on here that I made under a different screen name that I should delete.  Which means I can get rid of the extra screen name as well.  I like only having one.  I&#8217;ll delete that today in the hopes it doesn&#8217;t screw this one up somehow.</p>
<p>So, as you can see, Twitter and I are not a good fit.  I&#8217;m pretty sure I have used more than 140 characters.  How frustrating that would be for someone like me?  I&#8217;m glad I never set up an account with them.  Damn, I&#8217;ll bet I am up to at least 150 characters.</p>
<p>Sandy</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

