<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: House representatives vote &#8216;no&#8217; on women&#8217;s rights, &#8216;yes&#8217; on war</title>
	<atom:link href="http://trueslant.com/allisonkilkenny/2009/11/08/house-representatives-vote-no-on-womens-rights-yes-for-war/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://trueslant.com/allisonkilkenny/2009/11/08/house-representatives-vote-no-on-womens-rights-yes-for-war/</link>
	<description>[Please go to &#039;Settings&#039; to change your Tagline]</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 10 Sep 2011 11:21:50 -0400</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Zaid Jilani</title>
		<link>http://trueslant.com/allisonkilkenny/2009/11/08/house-representatives-vote-no-on-womens-rights-yes-for-war/comment-page-1/#comment-1474</link>
		<dc:creator>Zaid Jilani</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Nov 2009 02:00:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://trueslant.com/allisonkilkenny/?p=2317#comment-1474</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m not one way or the other on choice issues very strongly, but I think it&#039;s remarkable how much the Democrats can get away with slapping their own base in the face sometimes.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m not one way or the other on choice issues very strongly, but I think it&#8217;s remarkable how much the Democrats can get away with slapping their own base in the face sometimes.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rick Ungar</title>
		<link>http://trueslant.com/allisonkilkenny/2009/11/08/house-representatives-vote-no-on-womens-rights-yes-for-war/comment-page-1/#comment-1469</link>
		<dc:creator>Rick Ungar</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Nov 2009 16:40:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://trueslant.com/allisonkilkenny/?p=2317#comment-1469</guid>
		<description>I did my own research.
It turns out that 46% of health insurance policies in the country DO provide for elective abortion services. I never knew that.
That said, I very much see your point. By disallowing such policies to enter the health exchange and to only permit elective abortion coverage vai a rider paid 100% by the policy holder and using no federal monies for administration or anything else, these policies will be dropping the elective abortion coverage. That means that only those with the funds to pay the entire bill will be able to get coverage. Thus, your point is made and is absolutely correct.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I did my own research.<br />
It turns out that 46% of health insurance policies in the country DO provide for elective abortion services. I never knew that.<br />
That said, I very much see your point. By disallowing such policies to enter the health exchange and to only permit elective abortion coverage vai a rider paid 100% by the policy holder and using no federal monies for administration or anything else, these policies will be dropping the elective abortion coverage. That means that only those with the funds to pay the entire bill will be able to get coverage. Thus, your point is made and is absolutely correct.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Thanks for nothing, Congress. Is it election time yet? &#171; Nailing Jello to the Wall</title>
		<link>http://trueslant.com/allisonkilkenny/2009/11/08/house-representatives-vote-no-on-womens-rights-yes-for-war/comment-page-1/#comment-1466</link>
		<dc:creator>Thanks for nothing, Congress. Is it election time yet? &#171; Nailing Jello to the Wall</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Nov 2009 15:47:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://trueslant.com/allisonkilkenny/?p=2317#comment-1466</guid>
		<description>[...] outrageous that our Democratic majority Congress has passed such an amendment. It is a disgrace. Allison Kilkenny points out that 19 Democrats who voted for the Stupak Amendment (essentially voting [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] outrageous that our Democratic majority Congress has passed such an amendment. It is a disgrace. Allison Kilkenny points out that 19 Democrats who voted for the Stupak Amendment (essentially voting [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Allison Kilkenny: House Representatives Vote &#8216;No&#8217; On Women&#8217;s Rights, &#8216;Yes&#8217; On War &#124; Old People News</title>
		<link>http://trueslant.com/allisonkilkenny/2009/11/08/house-representatives-vote-no-on-womens-rights-yes-for-war/comment-page-1/#comment-1465</link>
		<dc:creator>Allison Kilkenny: House Representatives Vote &#8216;No&#8217; On Women&#8217;s Rights, &#8216;Yes&#8217; On War &#124; Old People News</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Nov 2009 12:04:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://trueslant.com/allisonkilkenny/?p=2317#comment-1465</guid>
		<description>[...] from Allison Kilkenny&#8217;s blog. Also available on Facebook and [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] from Allison Kilkenny&#8217;s blog. Also available on Facebook and [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: conceptionlife</title>
		<link>http://trueslant.com/allisonkilkenny/2009/11/08/house-representatives-vote-no-on-womens-rights-yes-for-war/comment-page-1/#comment-1464</link>
		<dc:creator>conceptionlife</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Nov 2009 05:35:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://trueslant.com/allisonkilkenny/?p=2317#comment-1464</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m not sure what type of argument you are trying to form by showing how certain democrats vote on going to war compared to how they voted on the Stupak-Pitts Ammendment.

I think it&#039;s completely ridiculous that so many people, including politicians, still follow party lines.

However, I&#039;m glad that some Deomcrats have finally gone against how their party typically votes to show that the majority of Americans do not support the killing of inocent children who have no voice.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m not sure what type of argument you are trying to form by showing how certain democrats vote on going to war compared to how they voted on the Stupak-Pitts Ammendment.</p>
<p>I think it&#8217;s completely ridiculous that so many people, including politicians, still follow party lines.</p>
<p>However, I&#8217;m glad that some Deomcrats have finally gone against how their party typically votes to show that the majority of Americans do not support the killing of inocent children who have no voice.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: scammaj</title>
		<link>http://trueslant.com/allisonkilkenny/2009/11/08/house-representatives-vote-no-on-womens-rights-yes-for-war/comment-page-1/#comment-1463</link>
		<dc:creator>scammaj</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Nov 2009 03:36:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://trueslant.com/allisonkilkenny/?p=2317#comment-1463</guid>
		<description>Just for the record, not everyone agrees that killing a fetus is a woman&#039;s right. Interchanging &quot;abortion&quot; with &quot;woman&#039;s rights&quot; is a bit misleading.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Just for the record, not everyone agrees that killing a fetus is a woman&#8217;s right. Interchanging &#8220;abortion&#8221; with &#8220;woman&#8217;s rights&#8221; is a bit misleading.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Throwing women under the bus &#171; Dating Jesus</title>
		<link>http://trueslant.com/allisonkilkenny/2009/11/08/house-representatives-vote-no-on-womens-rights-yes-for-war/comment-page-1/#comment-1461</link>
		<dc:creator>Throwing women under the bus &#171; Dating Jesus</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Nov 2009 00:36:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://trueslant.com/allisonkilkenny/?p=2317#comment-1461</guid>
		<description>[...] compromises where a horse becomes a giraffe, and a great idea becomes  perfectly horrible one. The Stupak-Pitts amendment is not progress, and if ever you thought a woman&#8217;s right to choose her reproductive destiny [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] compromises where a horse becomes a giraffe, and a great idea becomes  perfectly horrible one. The Stupak-Pitts amendment is not progress, and if ever you thought a woman&#8217;s right to choose her reproductive destiny [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rick Ungar</title>
		<link>http://trueslant.com/allisonkilkenny/2009/11/08/house-representatives-vote-no-on-womens-rights-yes-for-war/comment-page-1/#comment-1458</link>
		<dc:creator>Rick Ungar</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 08 Nov 2009 22:56:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://trueslant.com/allisonkilkenny/?p=2317#comment-1458</guid>
		<description>While I am not supported of the Stupak Amendment, I&#039;m having trouble working out how Firedog reaches their conclusion. I&#039;m unaware of any insurance policy in existence that covers elective abortion. Indeed, virtually any elective procedure remains uncovered by insurance policies. I&#039;m also at something of a loss to understand how this allows an insurance company to legally discriminate against low income Americans. While I suppose you could argue that higher income Americans will have the money to pay for abortions out of pocket -something that lower income individuals might not be able to do, this would not meet any test of legal discrimination. Not to suggest that a nose job and an abortion are the same thing, but higher income Americans can pay for cosmetic surgery that a person with less money would not be able to access. 
I wonder if you could provide a bit more explanation on both issues. Why does this constitute a far reaching ban on abortion when there has been no previous such opportunity? Why would it be legally discrimination against low income Americans?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>While I am not supported of the Stupak Amendment, I&#8217;m having trouble working out how Firedog reaches their conclusion. I&#8217;m unaware of any insurance policy in existence that covers elective abortion. Indeed, virtually any elective procedure remains uncovered by insurance policies. I&#8217;m also at something of a loss to understand how this allows an insurance company to legally discriminate against low income Americans. While I suppose you could argue that higher income Americans will have the money to pay for abortions out of pocket -something that lower income individuals might not be able to do, this would not meet any test of legal discrimination. Not to suggest that a nose job and an abortion are the same thing, but higher income Americans can pay for cosmetic surgery that a person with less money would not be able to access.<br />
I wonder if you could provide a bit more explanation on both issues. Why does this constitute a far reaching ban on abortion when there has been no previous such opportunity? Why would it be legally discrimination against low income Americans?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Allison Kilkenny: House Representatives Vote &#8216;No&#8217; On Women&#8217;s Rights, &#8216;Yes&#8217; On War :: Anything about Everything!</title>
		<link>http://trueslant.com/allisonkilkenny/2009/11/08/house-representatives-vote-no-on-womens-rights-yes-for-war/comment-page-1/#comment-1457</link>
		<dc:creator>Allison Kilkenny: House Representatives Vote &#8216;No&#8217; On Women&#8217;s Rights, &#8216;Yes&#8217; On War :: Anything about Everything!</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 08 Nov 2009 22:48:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://trueslant.com/allisonkilkenny/?p=2317#comment-1457</guid>
		<description>[...] from Allison Kilkenny&#8217;s blog. Also available on Facebook and [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] from Allison Kilkenny&#8217;s blog. Also available on Facebook and [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Allison Kilkenny: House Representatives Vote &#8216;No&#8217; On Women&#8217;s Rights, &#8216;Yes&#8217; On War &#124; Obama Biden White House</title>
		<link>http://trueslant.com/allisonkilkenny/2009/11/08/house-representatives-vote-no-on-womens-rights-yes-for-war/comment-page-1/#comment-1456</link>
		<dc:creator>Allison Kilkenny: House Representatives Vote &#8216;No&#8217; On Women&#8217;s Rights, &#8216;Yes&#8217; On War &#124; Obama Biden White House</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 08 Nov 2009 21:55:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://trueslant.com/allisonkilkenny/?p=2317#comment-1456</guid>
		<description>[...] from Allison Kilkenny&#8217;s blog. Also available on Facebook and Twitter. Share this on del.icio.usDigg this!Share this on [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] from Allison Kilkenny&#8217;s blog. Also available on Facebook and Twitter. Share this on del.icio.usDigg this!Share this on [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

