What Is True/Slant?
275+ knowledgeable contributors.
Reporting and insight on news of the moment.
Follow them and join the news conversation.
 

Nov. 5 2009 - 8:47 am | 329 views | 1 recommendation | 7 comments

Guy Fawkes protesters finally celebrate the right way

Guy Fawkes (Image from Harpers)

Guy Fawkes (Image from Harpers)

On November 5, 1605, England held a celebration for the opening of Parliament. Guy Fawkes tried to spark a revolution by blowing up the building, and the royals inside, in protest over the Protestant leadership’s treatment of Catholics, which included torture and hangings.

Unfortunately for Fawkes, he was nabbed before he blew up anything, tortured, and  – before he could be publicly executed — lept from the gallows and broke his neck.

Afterwards, Londoners were encouraged to mock Fawkes — probably because the thought of a lone loon getting that close to assassinating royals spooked the hell out of the oligarchy. Thus, the popular contemporary verse was born:

Remember, remember the fifth of November,
The gunpowder treason and plot,
I know of no reason
Why the gunpowder treason
Should ever be forgot.

In modern times, it became tradition for children to burn effigies of Fawkes as part of the Bonfire Night celebration.

He has a complicated legacy — part mocked, part celebrated. Fawkes has sort of become history’s clown — the man who took on impossible odds, accomplished nothing, and died a pointless death. Though no King has disseminated orders, he’s still burned in effigy today. Yet, he’s also a beloved symbol of Anarchist resistance. Fawkes was ranked 30th in the 2002 list of the BBC’s 100 Greatest Britons by the public. Rivers, parks, and islands are named after him.

Even as people mock Fawkes, they seem to love him, and this year, protesters finally understand the spirit of Guy Fawkes Day. Though this group still decided to burn an effigy, they aimed their anger at the ruling class.

Protesters calling for Parliamentary reform in the wake of the MPs’ expenses scandal are using Guy Fawkes day today to float an effigy up the Thames to the Houses of Parliament.

The campaigners are setting off from an East London wharf pulling a 10ft high duck house to dock at the Palace of Westminster while they claim MPs are busy plotting to overturn Sir Christopher Kelly’s recommendations on claiming for mortgages and employing relatives.

[snip]

The Vote for a Change campaign is calling for a referendum “to bring accountability to Parliament.”

A quest for accountability really was the root of Fawkes’s plot. Admittedly, he picked the crudest, most violent means to express his disdain for the governing principles of the royals. However, a suppressed people who feel they lack representation in their government usually lash out in “uncivilized” ways. Human beings can only be beaten, mistreated, and marginalized for so long before they snap.

As Stephen Addison wrote on the Reuters blog, “should it not now be conceded that [Fawkes] might have had a point, even if his methods were a little extreme?”

The oligarchy is misbehaving once again. Corrupt, overfed, and cruel to their constituents – who are poorer, sicker, and angrier than ever — the residents of the Houses of Power should not raise their brows in surprise when a flaming effigy floats by them. It’s just a sign that the people finally recognize the true villains of history — and it’s not some dead dude who wore a funny hat.


Comments

Active Conversation
7 Total Comments
Post your comment »
 
  1. collapse expand

    While I like V for Vendetta as much as the next anarcho-Alan Moore fan… did Guy Fawkes really have a problem with the oligarchic theocracy? Or was it just the wrong oligarchic theocracy? Wasn’t the plan just to replace the Protestant King with a Catholic Queen? Which, in turn, would have given the Catholic some influence over England? Thus interfering with England’s own independence? I really don’t see anything particularly anarchisty about any of that. Unless they are the stereotypical, at least partially fictional, bomb-throwing anarchists. And if so, those people have been giving anarchists a bad name for long enough. No, no, Fawkes was basically just a religious extremist — the original suicide bomber.

    With that said, I do like that often repeated line that he was “The only man to enter parliament with honest intentions!” That much is probably true.

  2. collapse expand

    I have to say that Fawkes has really been hijacked by the anarchist movement – Fawkes was nothing of the sort. His plan was to replace the dictatorial Protestant monarchy and aristocracy with the Catholic equivalent.
    He was just a religious extremist who disliked the particular brand of religious extremism perpetrated by King James I.
    That said, I do rather like the effigies being burnt this year – my favorite is in Hastings, where three pigs are being burnt to represent bankers, politicians and the introduction of charges for NHS car-parks.

  3. collapse expand

    [...] This post was mentioned on Twitter by allisonkilkenny and Tris Miller, Tweets Tube. Tweets Tube said: Guy Fawkes protesters finally celebrate the right way http://bit.ly/2HFzyl [...]

  4. collapse expand

    [...] of Decade, Politics and Republicans Tags: hyperrealism Allison Kilkenney takes a deeper look. A quest for accountability really was the root of Fawkes’s plot. Admittedly, he picked the [...]

  5. collapse expand

    [...] Guy Fawkes protesters finally celebrate right way by Allison Kilkenny [...]

Log in for notification options
Comments RSS

Post Your Comment

You must be logged in to post a comment

Log in with your True/Slant account.

Previously logged in with Facebook?

Create an account to join True/Slant now.

Facebook users:
Create T/S account with Facebook
 

My T/S Activity Feed

 
 

About Me

I co-host Citizen Radio, the alternative political radio show. I am a contributing reporter to Huffington Post, Alternet.org, and The Nation.

My essay "Youth Surviving Subprime" appears in The Nation's new book, Meltdown: How Greed and Corruption Shattered Our Financial System and How We Can Recover beside esssays by Ralph Nader, Joseph Stiglitz, Barbara Ehrenreich, and Naomi Klein, who I'm told are all important people.

G. Gordon Liddy once told me my writing makes him want to vomit, which is the greatest compliment I've ever been paid ever.

See my profile »
Followers: 280
Contributor Since: May 2009
Location:New York, New York

What I'm Up To

  • In The Nation’s New Book

    picture-11

    Check out my article “Youth Surviving Subprime” in The Nation’s new book beside essays by Ralph Nader, Joseph Stiglitz, Barbara Ehrenreich, and Naomi Klein.

     
  • Citizen Radio

    I co-host the weekly political-comedy show, Citizen Radio. It’s like CNN, but with more swearing. Citizen Radio covers the stories that the mainstream, corporate media ignores. Past guests include: Noam Chomsky, Howard Zinn, Ralph Nader, Tariq Ali, Paul Rieckhoff, Janeane Garofalo, Melissa Harris-Lacewell, and more…

    Go to wearecitizenradio.com and click on the iTunes logo to subscribe to our podcast for FREE. Also, join us on Facebook

     
.<
  • +O
  • +O
>.