What Is True/Slant?
275+ knowledgeable contributors.
Reporting and insight on news of the moment.
Follow them and join the news conversation.
 

Oct. 28 2009 - 7:39 am | 21 views | 4 recommendations | 9 comments

CIA pays off another Afghan despot, hopes for the best

Ahmed Wali Karzai (Ruth Fremson/The New York Times)

Ahmed Wali Karzai (Ruth Fremson/The New York Times)

Ahmed Wali Karzai, the brother of the Afghan president and a suspected player in the country’s booming illegal opium trade, gets regular payments from the Central Intelligence Agency, and has for much of the past eight years, according to current and former American officials.

via Brother of Afghan Leader Is Said to Be on C.I.A. Payroll – NYTimes.com

Karzai’s duties include helping to recruit an Afghan paramilitary force that operates at the CIA’s direction (for now) in and around the southern city of Kandahar, and he is also the CIA’s landlord. Karzai rents the former home of Mullah Mohammed Omar, the Taliban’s founder, to the CIA and American Special Operations troops for paramilitary operations spearheaded by a group called the Kandahar Strike Force. On at least one occasion, the Times reports, the strike force has been accused of mounting an unauthorized operation against an official of the Afghan government.

This, to put it mildly, seems like a weird strategy considering Karzai is a player in the opium trade, a major source of revenue for the Taliban.

It appears as though the CIA is — yet again — employing the good ole’ “The Enemy of My Enemy is The Guy Who Screws Me In The End” foreign policy doctrine utilized by the United States and its allies when they supported the Afghan Mujahideen in their efforts to thwart the occupying Soviet power.

That worked out fine, right?

The Times muses that supporting a drug lord may undermine America’s efforts of developing an effective central government that can “maintain law and order and eventually allow the United States to withdraw.” I would agree. Propping up a major drug player and bankrolling his culture of corruption may not be the wisest strategy in a game entirely based on stabilization.

Of course, none of this is new to the Afghan strategy. At the start of the war, American officials paid warlords with — what the Times adorably describes as — “questionable backgrounds” to help topple the Taliban and maintain order with relatively few American troops committed to fight in the country. Even those warlords that didn’t directly benefit monetarily from the United States were nonetheless permitted to flourish in the chaotic aftermath of the U.S. led invasion.

There was Mohammed Qasim Fahim. After the U.S.-led invasion of Afghanistan in 2001, Fahim became first defense minister and then vice president of Afghanistan. But before all that, he was the former senior commander of the Jamiat-e-Islami militia, and was named by Human Rights Watch in its 2005 report Blood Stained Hands as a key commander in the Afshar Massacre during which about 800 members of the Shia Muslim Hazara minority were killed in a bout of murder, rape and looting in a civilian area of Kabul in September 1992.

Then there was Haji Mohammed Mohaqiq, leader of the notorious Hezb-e Wahdat, which in late 2001-early 2002 targeted Pashtun civilians for violence because of their ethnic ties to the Taliban. Human Rights Watch reports that Hezb-e Wahdat

“[was] implicated in systematic and widespread looting and violence in almost every province under their…control, almost all of it directed at Pashtun villagers. In scores of villages, homes were destroyed, possessions were taken, and men and boys were beaten and in some cases killed.…

[T]here were several reports of rapes of girls and women. In Chimtal district near Mazar-e Sharif, and in Balkh province generally, both Hizb-i Wahdat and Jamiat forces were particularly violent: in one village, Bargah-e Afghani, Hizb-i Wahdat troops killed thirty-seven civilians.”

Mohaqiq moved on to become vice chair of the interim government and Minister of Planning where he used threats and intimidation against other delegates. You can take the boy out of the human rights violations, but you can’t take the human rights violations out of the boy, am I right?

In order to intimidate delegates, Mohaqiq formed a militia that became famous for kidnapping young girls, “forcibly marrying” them AKA raping them, and ransoming them back to their parents. Their favorite strategy was to snatch up girls who were on their way to school, which resulted in parents keeping their girls home rather than risk their abduction and rape.

Good news: President Karzai has promised to carve out a province for Mohaqiq so he can roam free, happily raping and pillaging.

Then there’s Gulbuddin Hekmatyar and Jalaluddin Haqqani, two warlords who were once among America’s most valued allies. In the 1980s, the CIA funneled hundreds of millions of dollars in weapons and ammunition to help them battle the Soviets. Now, Hekmatyar is “as vicious as they come,” according to a senior defense official, while Haqqani’s son (Haqqani himself is believed to be dead) “is definitely the strongest” enemy in the border provinces of Paktia, Paktika, and Khost, known among military officials as p2k.

The list goes on, and on, and on. The names change, but the results are always the same: the enemy of my enemy is the guy who screws me in the end. It’s almost like funneling hundreds of millions of dollars into a culture of unaccountability, rape, torture, kidnapping, drugs, and corruption is a really bad idea. Oh well. That’s why I’m not paid as a “serious expert.” I’m sure Henry Kissinger is somewhere, saying something really valuable about this subject. Let’s ask him.


Comments

Active Conversation
9 Total Comments
Post your comment »
 
  1. collapse expand

    It has been rumored for years that the CIA uses drug money to fund it’s clandestine operations to avoid Congressional oversight. Any wonder the War On Drugs is a futile, and costly, failure?

  2. collapse expand

    Allison, amen. These facts do seem at odds with a hope for ‘a credible partner’ within the Afghan government,and other democracy promoting schemes.

  3. collapse expand

    Ms. Kilkenny,

    This piece in the NYT combined with the piece from T/S’s Afghan Desk (P.J. Tobia) piece about the insurgents on Facebook

    http://trueslant.com/pjtobia/2009/10/22/insurgent-who-aided-bin-ladens-escape-wants-to-be-friends-on-facebook/

    make it clear that Afghanistan is a true hall of mirrors, no one is what they appear to be and what they are and appear to be change constantly. Everyone is playing both ends against the middle. More than every it is unclear what the political objectives of US / NATO military presence is.

  4. collapse expand

    Thank you for bringing this back to the Soviet-Afghan War debacle of the 1980s. It seems that we as Americans have such short-term memory that we do not remember when Reagan called the mujahideen “Freedom Fighters” before offshoots of this C.I.A. funded and trained group (through Pakistan’s I.S.I., just for one more degree of separation) would go on to found, among other enterprises, the Taliban and Al-Qaeda. It seems that by bankrolling Karzai we are simply heading down that same road.

    It also throws a wrench into the whole “democracy” thing in Afghanistan. We are paying the president’s brother to carry out services for us; how much pressure can we now put on President Karzai when the entirety of both the U.S. and Afghanistan knows his brother is a CIA beneficiary? It seems that in the game of diplomatic leverage we’re currently losing.

Log in for notification options
Comments RSS

Post Your Comment

You must be logged in to post a comment

Log in with your True/Slant account.

Previously logged in with Facebook?

Create an account to join True/Slant now.

Facebook users:
Create T/S account with Facebook
 

My T/S Activity Feed

 
     

    About Me

    I co-host Citizen Radio, the alternative political radio show. I am a contributing reporter to Huffington Post, Alternet.org, and The Nation.

    My essay "Youth Surviving Subprime" appears in The Nation's new book, Meltdown: How Greed and Corruption Shattered Our Financial System and How We Can Recover beside esssays by Ralph Nader, Joseph Stiglitz, Barbara Ehrenreich, and Naomi Klein, who I'm told are all important people.

    G. Gordon Liddy once told me my writing makes him want to vomit, which is the greatest compliment I've ever been paid ever.

    See my profile »
    Followers: 453
    Contributor Since: May 2009
    Location:New York, New York

    What I'm Up To

    • In The Nation’s New Book

      picture-11

      Check out my article “Youth Surviving Subprime” in The Nation’s new book beside essays by Ralph Nader, Joseph Stiglitz, Barbara Ehrenreich, and Naomi Klein.

       
    • Citizen Radio

      I co-host the biweekly political-comedy show, Citizen Radio. It’s like CNN, but with more swearing. Citizen Radio covers the stories that the mainstream, corporate media ignores. Past guests include: Noam Chomsky, Howard Zinn, Matt Taibbi, Jeremy Scahill, Ralph Nader, Tariq Ali,  Janeane Garofalo, Melissa Harris-Lacewell, and more…

      Go to wearecitizenradio.com and click on the iTunes logo to subscribe to our podcast for FREE. Also, join us on Facebook

       
    .<
    • +O
    • +O
    >.