<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: David Brooks proves Sonia Sotomayor just can&#8217;t win with Conservatives</title>
	<atom:link href="http://trueslant.com/allisonkilkenny/2009/06/09/david-brooks-proves-sonia-sotomayor-just-cant-win-with-conservatives/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://trueslant.com/allisonkilkenny/2009/06/09/david-brooks-proves-sonia-sotomayor-just-cant-win-with-conservatives/</link>
	<description>[Please go to &#039;Settings&#039; to change your Tagline]</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 10 Sep 2011 11:21:50 -0400</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Justin Nemath</title>
		<link>http://trueslant.com/allisonkilkenny/2009/06/09/david-brooks-proves-sonia-sotomayor-just-cant-win-with-conservatives/comment-page-1/#comment-178</link>
		<dc:creator>Justin Nemath</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 Jun 2009 07:30:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://trueslant.com/allisonkilkenny/?p=508#comment-178</guid>
		<description>This seems to be apart of the little game that the Republicans and the Democrats like to pay with each other, called &quot;partisan politics&quot; where the two groups just fight with each other just to be loyal to the party that they happen to belong to. As this happens, of course people are distracted from issues that actually matter, such as Health care or the war in Afghanistan. also these games are played with no actual regard for those who voted them in(even though the reasons they are elected happens to be based on empty promises anyways)and as someone who is supportive of neither party, I find it a waste a time to be playing these games while suffering in the world continues and its apparent that most of them don&#039;t care. On a side note, if she does not get accepted will her supporters see her as a lot of Robert Bork&#039;s(Reagan&#039;s 1987 Supreme Court nominee) supporters still see him, as someone who should have been on the Supreme Court(but its good he is not), because of so called &quot;unfair circumstances&quot; or do her supporters not really care that much? Also to be clear (because I don&#039;t want to be misinterpreted) I&#039;m not comparing their ideologies, because obviously they are not similar at all.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This seems to be apart of the little game that the Republicans and the Democrats like to pay with each other, called &#8220;partisan politics&#8221; where the two groups just fight with each other just to be loyal to the party that they happen to belong to. As this happens, of course people are distracted from issues that actually matter, such as Health care or the war in Afghanistan. also these games are played with no actual regard for those who voted them in(even though the reasons they are elected happens to be based on empty promises anyways)and as someone who is supportive of neither party, I find it a waste a time to be playing these games while suffering in the world continues and its apparent that most of them don&#8217;t care. On a side note, if she does not get accepted will her supporters see her as a lot of Robert Bork&#8217;s(Reagan&#8217;s 1987 Supreme Court nominee) supporters still see him, as someone who should have been on the Supreme Court(but its good he is not), because of so called &#8220;unfair circumstances&#8221; or do her supporters not really care that much? Also to be clear (because I don&#8217;t want to be misinterpreted) I&#8217;m not comparing their ideologies, because obviously they are not similar at all.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

