What Is True/Slant?
275+ knowledgeable contributors.
Reporting and insight on news of the moment.
Follow them and join the news conversation.

Apr. 8 2010 - 9:50 am | 1,720 views | 0 recommendations | 5 comments

Ohio judge sues Cleveland Plain Dealer for $50 million after being outed as an anonymous commenter

Judge Shirley Strickland Saffold (aka Lawmiss?)

Plenty of anonymous online commenters have filed lawsuits after being outed, but this is the first instance I’m aware of where the plaintiff is a state judge. Ohio Judge Shirley Strickland Saffold and the Cleveland Plain Dealer have had a prickly relationship for years. She has not been happy about the way the paper has covered her cases.

In 2007, an online commenter named “lawmiss” registered on the Cleveland Plain Dealer website. Since then, Lawmiss has had critical things to say on articles about cases that came before Judge Saffold, questioning the professionalism of attorneys in those cases and defending Judge Saffold’s rulings. After lawmiss made an offensive comment about the relative of one of the paper’s journalists, the journalist looked up the e-mail address linked to the account — it was Judge Saffold’s AOL e-mail. The Paper then confronted her. When it did, she and her daughter claimed that it was her daughter who had made the online comments. I was dubious of that claim when I wrote about this at Above the Law.

Judge Saffold was (understandably) pissed about being outed. Now the AP reports that she’s suing the newspaper for $50 million…

Editor of the Plain Dealer Susan Goldberg defended the decision to out Saffold during an interview with NPR’s on the Media:

BOB GARFIELD: Reporters, including The Plain Dealer, will refuse to cooperate with courts and with law enforcement in identifying an anonymous source on the grounds of reporter-source privilege. This would, I’m sure, strike some people as hypocritical in the extreme, no?

SUSAN GOLDBERG: It, it does strike some of our readers as hypocritical. I think it’s a totally different thing. If you read our privacy policy, it says that we will sell your name, it says that we can use information about you for any legitimate business purpose, and it says that if the police ask us who you are, we’re going to turn over that information.

Now, what we do give to sources who give us important information in off-the-record agreements is a guarantee of anonymity. I think these are, are vastly different.

It doesn’t seem that different to me. It’s just that journalists are more beholden to their sources than to their readers (for now).

The press release about the lawsuit from Saffold’s attorney says, “The Privacy Statement on Cleveland.com provides that “personally identifying information is protected” and contains promises to ‘protect your privacy.’” Saffold is still being careful to claim that her daughter, Sydney, made all the suspiciously insightful comments on the Plain Dealer’s site, arguing that the paper violated her daughter’s privacy.

The judge is pretty knowledgeable about the law, and recognizes this lawsuit is going to be an uphill battle:

While invasion of privacy and false light claims are extremely difficult to prosecute, especially when public figures or officials are involved, the claims that we are primarily pursuing on behalf of Judge Saffold and Sydney are based on the contractual promises contained in the Privacy Statement. They made promises that they knew its users would rely on, but never intended to keep those promises.

I think the Cleveland Plain Dealer has a strong argument for why it outed Saffold. Judges are prohibited from making substantive comments about cases before them. If Saffold was behind the lawmiss comments, she definitely crossed an ethical line.

The Plain Dealer is now saying that “company officials are taking steps to block reporters and editors from seeing e-mail addresses in the future,” but I don’t think that’s going to be very reassuring to the newspaper’s other anonymous commenters.

The culture of online anonymity is changing rapidly. This cartoon is starting to look like a museum relic. On the Internet these days, it seems like everyone does know if you’re a dog.


2 T/S Member Comments Called Out, 5 Total Comments
Post your comment »
  1. collapse expand

    This story couldn’t have been more perfect for you if you’d written it yourself, “Judge Saffold.”

  2. collapse expand

    I agree, she is in an uphill fight. As a Clevelander, I think she had it coming, the seems like half our government has court cases against them, and they are used to not being challenged. The city would not be in the shape it is if the government here was not so corrupt.

Log in for notification options
Comments RSS

Post Your Comment

You must be logged in to post a comment

Log in with your True/Slant account.

Previously logged in with Facebook?

Create an account to join True/Slant now.

Facebook users:
Create T/S account with Facebook

My T/S Activity Feed


    About Me

    I am a writer, reporter, editor and blogger. I'm an editor at Above The Law, where I blog about lawyers, judges, law firms and the legal industry. Here at True/Slant, I write about our changing notions of privacy.

    If you have story ideas or tips, e-mail me at kashhill@trueslant.com. I've hung out in quite a few newsrooms over the last few years. Currently, I can be found in Breaking Media's Nolita office. In the past, I've been found in midtown Manhattan at The Week Magazine, in Hong Kong at the International Herald Tribune, and in D.C. at the National Press Foundation and the Washington Examiner.

    I have few illusions about privacy -- feel free to follow me on Twitter: kashhill. Or friend me on Facebook... though I might put you on limited profile.

    See my profile »
    Followers: 401
    Contributor Since: March 2009
    Location:New York, NY

    What I'm Up To

    • Staying Above The Law


      Over at Above The Law, I write about lawyers, law firms, judges and the legal industry.

      We especially like “colorful news.” (Yes, that’s a euphemism for gossip.)

      Check out the site here and my stuff here.


    • Writing with real ink

      While most of my writing occurs online at Above The Law and True/Slant, I do occasionally venture into the world of print.  These are some of the magazines and newspapers that I’ve written for:

      The Washington Post

      Washingtonian Magazine

      Time Out New York

      The Orange County Register

      The Washington Examiner

    • Recent projects

      washingtonian issue for tsThe latest (and longest) “real ink” project: the cover story for Washingtonian Magazine’s December issue.

      While I’m usually a writer and reporter, I’m sometimes asked to play pundit. In November, the New York Times asked me to write a mini op-ed for its Room for Debate blog. In December, BBC radio asked me to talk about Mark Zuckerberg and Facebook privacy settings for its Newshour (19:00 minute mark), based on this True/Slant post.

    • +O
    • +O
    • +O