What Is True/Slant?
275+ knowledgeable contributors.
Reporting and insight on news of the moment.
Follow them and join the news conversation.
 

Feb. 9 2010 - 12:13 am | 1,458 views | 0 recommendations | 3 comments

Yet another reason to password-protect your smartphone

Image representing iPhone as depicted in Crunc...

Image via CrunchBase

Putting a password on your phone is good for keeping a paranoid significant other from snooping. It’s also a good idea in case you’re arrested. From the Electronic Frontier Foundation:

Police in Daly City, California seized a suspect’s iPhone during his arrest. Hours later, investigators bypassed the password and searched through the data on the device without a search warrant. After the officers realized that the information was too extensive to write down, they finally obtained a warrant to search the phone.

EFF has urged the court to suppress evidence gathered by police from the suspect’s phone during the warrantless search, including contacts, called phone numbers, emails, text messages, Internet search history, and photos. EFF has also asked the judge to quash the warrant that was eventually issued in part based on the information illegally accessed on the phone.

via EFF Asks Court to Suppress Evidence Illegally Gathered From Password-Protected Phone | Electronic Frontier Foundation.

The court documents [PDF] offer a bit more detail. Christian Taylor is a founder of Hype UniverCity, a company with an annoying name and a confusing mission — something about harnessing college-bound students’ purchasing power. Whatever it is that Hype does, it requires many BlackBerrys.

Taylor went to a Sprint store to buy 30 BlackBerrys for his company, but he didn’t have proper documentation for his business with him. He said he would return the next day with his company’s tax id and articles of incorporation. For some reason, this made the clerk suspicious.

When Taylor returned the next day, the clerk called the police…

According to the complaint that EFF has filed on Taylor’s behalf, the police arrested Taylor and seized his iPhone:

Mr. Taylor’s iPhone was password protected. Rather than placing the phone in inventory, as is appropriate when an item is seized incident to arrest, Officer Bocci bypassed the password on the phone and searched its contents.

Apparently, Taylor didn’t have a very cryptic password?

Detective Bocci told Mr. Taylor that he knew how to access iPhone information because he used to own one. The officers then questioned Mr. Taylor about information they found during the search of the iPhone, including questions about why his girlfriend needed a nice new outfit to wear on Friday….

The information officers found stored on the iPhone, or by accessing Mr. Taylor’s email accounts via his iPhone includes, but is not limited to, the number 510-378-**** displayed on the phone, the number Defendant provided on the booking sheet, a large amount of information, including phone book contacts, called phone numbers, emails, text messages, Internet search history, and photos.

The EFF has filed a motion to have the evidence found during this warrantless search suppressed. (They don’t include information about what incriminating evidence was found or why buying 30 BlackBerrys is suspicious.)

Still: Just because a police officer knows how to operate an iPhone doesn’t mean that the Fourth Amendment ceases to exist.

It also illustrates why it’s important to put a fairly complex password on your smartphone. “1-2-3-4″ — or whatever easy combination Taylor likely chose — isn’t going to cut it.


Comments

One T/S Member Comment Called Out, 3 Total Comments
Post your comment »
 
  1. collapse expand

    Okay, so I read the court document and I am completely confused as to how a clerk can call the police and have a customer arrested for wanting to buy 30 Blackberrys. And then to have the charges made up by the police that have nothing to do with what the customer tried to accomplish. Two counts of identity theft, commercial burglary, and attempted grand theft?
    This case is wrong on so many counts. The defendant did not give permission for the police to search his car and they did anyway. The clerk would be fired ASAP if I was the owner of that store. How do you turn away the sale of 30 Blackberrys?

    I guess this is how America slips into the category of a police state.
    Although there was a humorous side to the story, I had a MacGruber moment when “Detective Bocci told Mr. Taylor that he knew how to access iPhone information because he used to own one.” Good thing this muttonhead doesn’t show up when the bomb squad is attempting to defuse an explosive.

Log in for notification options
Comments RSS

Post Your Comment

You must be logged in to post a comment

Log in with your True/Slant account.

Previously logged in with Facebook?

Create an account to join True/Slant now.

Facebook users:
Create T/S account with Facebook
 

My T/S Activity Feed

 
     

    About Me

    I am a writer, reporter, editor and blogger. I'm an editor at Above The Law, where I blog about lawyers, judges, law firms and the legal industry. Here at True/Slant, I write about our changing notions of privacy.

    If you have story ideas or tips, e-mail me at kashhill@trueslant.com. I've hung out in quite a few newsrooms over the last few years. Currently, I can be found in Breaking Media's Nolita office. In the past, I've been found in midtown Manhattan at The Week Magazine, in Hong Kong at the International Herald Tribune, and in D.C. at the National Press Foundation and the Washington Examiner.

    I have few illusions about privacy -- feel free to follow me on Twitter: kashhill. Or friend me on Facebook... though I might put you on limited profile.

    See my profile »
    Followers: 401
    Contributor Since: March 2009
    Location:New York, NY

    What I'm Up To

    • Staying Above The Law

      judge

      Over at Above The Law, I write about lawyers, law firms, judges and the legal industry.

      We especially like “colorful news.” (Yes, that’s a euphemism for gossip.)

      Check out the site here and my stuff here.

      logo

       
    • Writing with real ink

      While most of my writing occurs online at Above The Law and True/Slant, I do occasionally venture into the world of print.  These are some of the magazines and newspapers that I’ve written for:

      The Washington Post

      Washingtonian Magazine

      Time Out New York

      The Orange County Register

      The Washington Examiner

       
    • Recent projects

      washingtonian issue for tsThe latest (and longest) “real ink” project: the cover story for Washingtonian Magazine’s December issue.

      While I’m usually a writer and reporter, I’m sometimes asked to play pundit. In November, the New York Times asked me to write a mini op-ed for its Room for Debate blog. In December, BBC radio asked me to talk about Mark Zuckerberg and Facebook privacy settings for its Newshour (19:00 minute mark), based on this True/Slant post.

       
    .<
    • +O
    • +O
    • +O
    >.