<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: These TSA porn photos would be alarming — if they were real</title>
	<atom:link href="http://trueslant.com/KashmirHill/2010/01/27/tsa-scanner-porn-hoax-fools-gizmodo-drudge-report/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://trueslant.com/KashmirHill/2010/01/27/tsa-scanner-porn-hoax-fools-gizmodo-drudge-report/</link>
	<description>Musings on the ebb and flow of privacy in the digital age</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 28 Jan 2013 20:36:56 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Reconsidering airport scanners &#62;&#62; The Thang Blog</title>
		<link>http://trueslant.com/KashmirHill/2010/01/27/tsa-scanner-porn-hoax-fools-gizmodo-drudge-report/comment-page-1/#comment-2535</link>
		<dc:creator>Reconsidering airport scanners &#62;&#62; The Thang Blog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 17 Nov 2012 11:13:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://trueslant.com/KashmirHill/?p=3787#comment-2535</guid>
		<description>[...] I&#8217;m still torn on whether or not I&#8217;ll go through them in the future, or continue to opt for the pat down. The scanning is (obviously) much quicker than the pat down, and the geek of me was kind of impressed: the new scanners are much better designed than the old, with open glass frames and no feeling of claustrophobia or discomfort. The use of generic body outlines, as opposed to the &#8216;naked&#8217; images of the old scanners, also relieves many of my worries about ending up on a scanner porn site. (It&#8217;s worth noting that the first image &#8211; which happens to be the most porno-rific &#8211; also appears to be faked.) [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] I&#8217;m still torn on whether or not I&#8217;ll go through them in the future, or continue to opt for the pat down. The scanning is (obviously) much quicker than the pat down, and the geek of me was kind of impressed: the new scanners are much better designed than the old, with open glass frames and no feeling of claustrophobia or discomfort. The use of generic body outlines, as opposed to the &#8216;naked&#8217; images of the old scanners, also relieves many of my worries about ending up on a scanner porn site. (It&#8217;s worth noting that the first image &#8211; which happens to be the most porno-rific &#8211; also appears to be faked.) [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: tsabodyscanner</title>
		<link>http://trueslant.com/KashmirHill/2010/01/27/tsa-scanner-porn-hoax-fools-gizmodo-drudge-report/comment-page-1/#comment-1972</link>
		<dc:creator>tsabodyscanner</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 Apr 2011 00:37:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://trueslant.com/KashmirHill/?p=3787#comment-1972</guid>
		<description>Those pictures may be fake, but a simple youtube search will reveal that the nude scanners do reveal quite a lot.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xKnY8-G26Ww&amp;t=0m47s

You can clearly see the guys penis moving around.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Those pictures may be fake, but a simple youtube search will reveal that the nude scanners do reveal quite a lot.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xKnY8-G26Ww&amp;t=0m47s" rel="nofollow">http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xKnY8-G26Ww&amp;t=0m47s</a></p>
<p>You can clearly see the guys penis moving around.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Video: FBI and Military use dogs for explosive detection, why not the airport. - FlyerTalk Forums</title>
		<link>http://trueslant.com/KashmirHill/2010/01/27/tsa-scanner-porn-hoax-fools-gizmodo-drudge-report/comment-page-1/#comment-1912</link>
		<dc:creator>Video: FBI and Military use dogs for explosive detection, why not the airport. - FlyerTalk Forums</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 29 Nov 2010 16:47:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://trueslant.com/KashmirHill/?p=3787#comment-1912</guid>
		<description>[...] of the machines right?    No it was put out in a post on Drudge Report and poached by Gizmodo  http://trueslant.com/KashmirHill/201...drudge-report/  What is scary is that this image lives on almost a year after it was proven fake.  I find this [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] of the machines right?    No it was put out in a post on Drudge Report and poached by Gizmodo  <a href="http://trueslant.com/KashmirHill/201...drudge-report/" rel="nofollow">http://trueslant.com/KashmirHill/201&#8230;drudge-report/</a>  What is scary is that this image lives on almost a year after it was proven fake.  I find this [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Don't Touch My Junk...</title>
		<link>http://trueslant.com/KashmirHill/2010/01/27/tsa-scanner-porn-hoax-fools-gizmodo-drudge-report/comment-page-1/#comment-1908</link>
		<dc:creator>Don't Touch My Junk...</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Nov 2010 19:51:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://trueslant.com/KashmirHill/?p=3787#comment-1908</guid>
		<description>[...] they inverted). pretty crazy.  http://www.anonymoushints.com/wp-con...ers-invert.jpg    its a hoax These TSA porn photos would be alarming      Selling out is totally punk rock.           Reply With Quote               + Reply to [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] they inverted). pretty crazy.  <a href="http://www.anonymoushints.com/wp-con...ers-invert.jpg" rel="nofollow">http://www.anonymoushints.com/wp-con&#8230;ers-invert.jpg</a>    its a hoax These TSA porn photos would be alarming      Selling out is totally punk rock.           Reply With Quote               + Reply to [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: American Airlines Pilots Revolt Against TSA - Page 6 - Airline Pilot Central Forums</title>
		<link>http://trueslant.com/KashmirHill/2010/01/27/tsa-scanner-porn-hoax-fools-gizmodo-drudge-report/comment-page-1/#comment-1903</link>
		<dc:creator>American Airlines Pilots Revolt Against TSA - Page 6 - Airline Pilot Central Forums</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Nov 2010 00:25:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://trueslant.com/KashmirHill/?p=3787#comment-1903</guid>
		<description>[...] scanner, those are actual photos of a nude woman retouched to make it look like scanner photos. These TSA porn photos would be alarming ? if they were real - Kashmir Hill - The Not-So Private Part...  Though it doesn&#039;t make the AIT machines any less egregious. Its still a virtual strip [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] scanner, those are actual photos of a nude woman retouched to make it look like scanner photos. These TSA porn photos would be alarming ? if they were real &#8211; Kashmir Hill &#8211; The Not-So Private Part&#8230;  Though it doesn&#39;t make the AIT machines any less egregious. Its still a virtual strip [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The TSA scanner porn hoax lingers on - Kashmir Hill - The Not-So Private Parts - Forbes</title>
		<link>http://trueslant.com/KashmirHill/2010/01/27/tsa-scanner-porn-hoax-fools-gizmodo-drudge-report/comment-page-1/#comment-1884</link>
		<dc:creator>The TSA scanner porn hoax lingers on - Kashmir Hill - The Not-So Private Parts - Forbes</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 31 Aug 2010 03:17:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://trueslant.com/KashmirHill/?p=3787#comment-1884</guid>
		<description>[...] I am able to track my traffic and its sources here at True/Slant. Over the past month and a half, I&#8217;ve been getting steady traffic to this post: These TSA porn photos would be alarming — if they were real. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] I am able to track my traffic and its sources here at True/Slant. Over the past month and a half, I&#8217;ve been getting steady traffic to this post: These TSA porn photos would be alarming — if they were real. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gizmodo, Drudge Fooled by Fake TSA &#34;porn.&#34;</title>
		<link>http://trueslant.com/KashmirHill/2010/01/27/tsa-scanner-porn-hoax-fools-gizmodo-drudge-report/comment-page-1/#comment-1878</link>
		<dc:creator>Gizmodo, Drudge Fooled by Fake TSA &#34;porn.&#34;</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Aug 2010 13:50:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://trueslant.com/KashmirHill/?p=3787#comment-1878</guid>
		<description>[...]  [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...]  [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The first case of sexual harassment via full body scanner &#124; UstaadKhan Blogs</title>
		<link>http://trueslant.com/KashmirHill/2010/01/27/tsa-scanner-porn-hoax-fools-gizmodo-drudge-report/comment-page-1/#comment-1262</link>
		<dc:creator>The first case of sexual harassment via full body scanner &#124; UstaadKhan Blogs</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 Mar 2010 13:28:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://trueslant.com/KashmirHill/?p=3787#comment-1262</guid>
		<description>[...] role is at the airport. Maybe she’s not actually a “scanner person” and has been fooled by this hoax into thinking her colleague captured a porn star version of [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] role is at the airport. Maybe she’s not actually a “scanner person” and has been fooled by this hoax into thinking her colleague captured a porn star version of [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: <fb:name linked="false" useyou="false" uid="1">Roger Ramjet</fb:name></title>
		<link>http://trueslant.com/KashmirHill/2010/01/27/tsa-scanner-porn-hoax-fools-gizmodo-drudge-report/comment-page-1/#comment-1205</link>
		<dc:creator><fb:name linked="false" useyou="false" uid="1">Roger Ramjet</fb:name></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 Mar 2010 23:02:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://trueslant.com/KashmirHill/?p=3787#comment-1205</guid>
		<description>Blogger reported that almost a month before you guys did.

http://towhichireplied.blogspot.com/2010/01/detail-of-airport-body-scanner-images.html</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Blogger reported that almost a month before you guys did.</p>
<p><a href="http://towhichireplied.blogspot.com/2010/01/detail-of-airport-body-scanner-images.html" rel="nofollow">http://towhichireplied.blogspot.com/2010/01/detail-of-airport-body-scanner-images.html</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tweets that mention These TSA porn photos would be alarming — if they were real - Kashmir Hill - The Not-So Private Parts - True/Slant -- Topsy.com</title>
		<link>http://trueslant.com/KashmirHill/2010/01/27/tsa-scanner-porn-hoax-fools-gizmodo-drudge-report/comment-page-1/#comment-1021</link>
		<dc:creator>Tweets that mention These TSA porn photos would be alarming — if they were real - Kashmir Hill - The Not-So Private Parts - True/Slant -- Topsy.com</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 Jan 2010 02:24:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://trueslant.com/KashmirHill/?p=3787#comment-1021</guid>
		<description>[...] This post was mentioned on Twitter by Laura Swisher, True/Slant, San Antonio, Log-Con, lewisdvorkin and others. lewisdvorkin said: RT @trueslant These TSA porn photos would be alarming. If they were real. - Kashmir Hill - The Not-So Private ... http://tinyurl.com/ya5cndy [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] This post was mentioned on Twitter by Laura Swisher, True/Slant, San Antonio, Log-Con, lewisdvorkin and others. lewisdvorkin said: RT @trueslant These TSA porn photos would be alarming. If they were real. &#8211; Kashmir Hill &#8211; The Not-So Private &#8230; <a href="http://tinyurl.com/ya5cndy" rel="nofollow">http://tinyurl.com/ya5cndy</a> [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
