<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Is it surprising that the DHS Privacy Office pretty much sucks?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://trueslant.com/KashmirHill/2009/10/29/is-it-surprising-that-the-dhs-privacy-office-pretty-much-sucks/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://trueslant.com/KashmirHill/2009/10/29/is-it-surprising-that-the-dhs-privacy-office-pretty-much-sucks/</link>
	<description>Musings on the ebb and flow of privacy in the digital age</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 23 Dec 2011 00:11:44 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Tweets that mention Kashmir Hill - The Not-So Private Parts – Is it surprising that the DHS Privacy Office pretty much sucks? - True/Slant -- Topsy.com</title>
		<link>http://trueslant.com/KashmirHill/2009/10/29/is-it-surprising-that-the-dhs-privacy-office-pretty-much-sucks/comment-page-1/#comment-467</link>
		<dc:creator>Tweets that mention Kashmir Hill - The Not-So Private Parts – Is it surprising that the DHS Privacy Office pretty much sucks? - True/Slant -- Topsy.com</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Oct 2009 19:50:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://trueslant.com/KashmirHill/?p=2981#comment-467</guid>
		<description>[...] This post was mentioned on Twitter by Kashmir Hill and benjamin barnes, Tweets Tube. Tweets Tube said: Is it surprising that the DHS Privacy Office pretty much sucks? http://bit.ly/9W0ER [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] This post was mentioned on Twitter by Kashmir Hill and benjamin barnes, Tweets Tube. Tweets Tube said: Is it surprising that the DHS Privacy Office pretty much sucks? <a href="http://bit.ly/9W0ER" rel="nofollow">http://bit.ly/9W0ER</a> [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kashmir Hill</title>
		<link>http://trueslant.com/KashmirHill/2009/10/29/is-it-surprising-that-the-dhs-privacy-office-pretty-much-sucks/comment-page-1/#comment-466</link>
		<dc:creator>Kashmir Hill</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Oct 2009 19:32:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://trueslant.com/KashmirHill/?p=2981#comment-466</guid>
		<description>I admit -- it is conflicted. I&#039;m glad you picked up on the David-Goliath subtext. I do like seeing walls come down -- I think that transparency in society can be a very good thing -- but privacy is a vast concept. I suspect rumors of its death -- even here at the NSPP -- may be greatly exaggerated.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I admit &#8212; it is conflicted. I&#8217;m glad you picked up on the David-Goliath subtext. I do like seeing walls come down &#8212; I think that transparency in society can be a very good thing &#8212; but privacy is a vast concept. I suspect rumors of its death &#8212; even here at the NSPP &#8212; may be greatly exaggerated.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Todd Essig</title>
		<link>http://trueslant.com/KashmirHill/2009/10/29/is-it-surprising-that-the-dhs-privacy-office-pretty-much-sucks/comment-page-1/#comment-465</link>
		<dc:creator>Todd Essig</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Oct 2009 18:25:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://trueslant.com/KashmirHill/?p=2981#comment-465</guid>
		<description>Maybe your acceptance of privacy&#039;s death has a bit more conflict attached than a simple &quot;deal with it.&quot; After all you &quot;admire&quot; the &quot;David-like persistence&quot; of those willing to fight for privacy as a foundational human value &quot;in the face of Goliathian anti-privacy forces.&quot; And, as we know, David won, eventually becoming king! Hail the King! Long live privacy!!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Maybe your acceptance of privacy&#8217;s death has a bit more conflict attached than a simple &#8220;deal with it.&#8221; After all you &#8220;admire&#8221; the &#8220;David-like persistence&#8221; of those willing to fight for privacy as a foundational human value &#8220;in the face of Goliathian anti-privacy forces.&#8221; And, as we know, David won, eventually becoming king! Hail the King! Long live privacy!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

