What Is True/Slant?
275+ knowledgeable contributors.
Reporting and insight on news of the moment.
Follow them and join the news conversation.

Aug. 21 2009 - 1:47 pm | 178 views | 0 recommendations | 7 comments

What are the rights of the ‘Skanks in NYC’ blogger?

cohen port skanks in nyc

Rosemary Port and Liskula Cohen (Image from Gothamist)

Update: ‘Skanks in NYC’ blogger plans to sue Google for $15 million and her lawyer compares her to America’s Founding Fathers. See new post. Newer update: Privacy expert says those plans will probably not work out.

This privacy story has been making the rounds in New York this week. Someone anonymously created a blog called “Skanks in NYC” and used it primarily to bash model Liskula Cohen. The blogger called Cohen a skank, a ho, and an old hag, among other nasty things, and posted photos of her, taken from various websites.

Cohen was not pleased and wanted to pursue a defamation lawsuit. That’s hard though, when you don’t know the identity of the person defaming you. Her lawyer asked the judge to force Google to reveal the identity of the blogger, whose blog was hosted by Google-owned Blogger.

The anonymous blogger’s lawyer resisted:

The blogger’s lawyer claimed that the views expressed were “hyperbole” and that blogs “have evolved as the modern-day soapbox for personal opinions.”

The lawyer also offered the view that blogs have “mere venting purposes, affording the less outspoken a protected forum for voicing gripes, leveling invective, and ranting about anything at all.”

via Judge: ‘Skanks in NYC’ blogger may be unmasked | Technically Incorrect – CNET News.

The blogger’s lawyer did not manage to convince the judge with that argument. On Monday, the judge ordered Google to turn the blogger in, or at least reveal her e-mail and IP address. Cohen was able to use that to figure out who the woman was. It turns out it’s someone Cohen knows socially. Now, thanks to court papers filed yesterday, we all know who she is:

Yesterday, after Cohen filed a $3 million defamation lawsuit against her nemesis, court papers at last revealed the blogger’s identity: one Rosemary Port, an unemployed nightclub hostess, “promoter,” and telemarketer.

via Skank Blogger Fully Revealed! – Gothamist.

According to the New York Post, it’s a classic girlfight. Port badmouthed Cohen online because Cohen had said nasty things about her to Port’s boyfriend. Gothamist hunted down Port’s photo on Facebook. It shows her lying naked in bed. It’s… well… it’s a bit skanky.

Privacy groups are concerned by the precedent set by the judge in forcing Google to reveal Port’s identity:

[U]sing the court system to successfully out the person establishes a troubling legal precedent, online privacy groups argue…

Such cases have popped up enough to earn their own moniker, “CyberSLAPP.” Cyberslapp.org, a Web-site developed by the American Civil Liberties Union, the Center for Democracy and Technology, the Electronic Frontier Foundation and others, says these suits are:

“… threatening to overturn the promise of anonymous online speech and chill the freedom of expression that is central to the online world. CyberSLAPP cases typically involve a person who has posted anonymous criticisms of a corporation or public figure on the Internet. The target of the criticism then files a frivolous lawsuit just so they can issue a subpoena to the Web site or Internet Service Provider (ISP) involved, discover the identity of their anonymous critic, and intimidate or silence them.”

via The Technology Chronicles : “Skank case” precedent worries privacy groups.

The San Francisco Chronicle has more experts weigh in on the case, who all agree that this is “a tough intersection of free speech and defamation.”

Interestingly, the model, Cohen, decided last night to drop her $3 million defamation suit against Port, which gives some credence to the claim that this may have been a ‘frivolous lawsuit just” to “issue a subpoena to the Web site or Internet Service Provider (ISP) involved, discover the identity of [an] anonymous critic, and intimidate” them.

I think the lesson is: if you don’t have anything nice to say, don’t say it on the Internet unless you’re okay with the fact that you might one day get outed.


One T/S Member Comment Called Out, 7 Total Comments
Post your comment »
  1. collapse expand

    I’ve seen this taken a step further. In Chicago, a politically connected developer is petitioning Google to give up not only the identity of a blogger that has criticized a project, but the identities of everyone who has posted a comment on the site. That applies to literally hundreds of residents. Chilling.

  2. collapse expand

    Or: If you don’t have anything nice to say, don’t pose naked on Facebook.

  3. collapse expand

    What I don’t understand is why anyone would setup a blog just to bash another person. Lots of extra time on her hands?

Log in for notification options
Comments RSS

Post Your Comment

You must be logged in to post a comment

Log in with your True/Slant account.

Previously logged in with Facebook?

Create an account to join True/Slant now.

Facebook users:
Create T/S account with Facebook

My T/S Activity Feed


    About Me

    I am a writer, reporter, editor and blogger. I'm an editor at Above The Law, where I blog about lawyers, judges, law firms and the legal industry. Here at True/Slant, I write about our changing notions of privacy.

    If you have story ideas or tips, e-mail me at kashhill@trueslant.com. I've hung out in quite a few newsrooms over the last few years. Currently, I can be found in Breaking Media's Nolita office. In the past, I've been found in midtown Manhattan at The Week Magazine, in Hong Kong at the International Herald Tribune, and in D.C. at the National Press Foundation and the Washington Examiner.

    I have few illusions about privacy -- feel free to follow me on Twitter: kashhill. Or friend me on Facebook... though I might put you on limited profile.

    See my profile »
    Followers: 401
    Contributor Since: March 2009
    Location:New York, NY

    What I'm Up To

    • Staying Above The Law


      Over at Above The Law, I write about lawyers, law firms, judges and the legal industry.

      We especially like “colorful news.” (Yes, that’s a euphemism for gossip.)

      Check out the site here and my stuff here.


    • Writing with real ink

      While most of my writing occurs online at Above The Law and True/Slant, I do occasionally venture into the world of print.  These are some of the magazines and newspapers that I’ve written for:

      The Washington Post

      Washingtonian Magazine

      Time Out New York

      The Orange County Register

      The Washington Examiner

    • Recent projects

      washingtonian issue for tsThe latest (and longest) “real ink” project: the cover story for Washingtonian Magazine’s December issue.

      While I’m usually a writer and reporter, I’m sometimes asked to play pundit. In November, the New York Times asked me to write a mini op-ed for its Room for Debate blog. In December, BBC radio asked me to talk about Mark Zuckerberg and Facebook privacy settings for its Newshour (19:00 minute mark), based on this True/Slant post.

    • +O
    • +O
    • +O