http://trueslant.com/KashmirHill/2009/08/19/facebook-privacy-lawsuit/ Musings on the ebb and flow of privacy in the digital age Fri, 23 Dec 2011 00:11:44 -0500 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2 hourly 1 http://trueslant.com/KashmirHill/2009/08/19/facebook-privacy-lawsuit/comment-page-1/#comment-510 hahahaha23 Thu, 05 Nov 2009 20:02:13 +0000 http://trueslant.com/KashmirHill/?p=1339#comment-510 If you knew law you would know that Plaintiff Beck needs to keep her account active in order to have a case. Her case is moot (legal term, FYI) if she deletes it. They can not post her status, picture or information if she deactivates her account, thus making the case moot. They can’t violate her privacy if her profile no longer exists. Nice spin, though. If you knew law you would know that Plaintiff Beck needs to keep her account active in order to have a case. Her case is moot (legal term, FYI) if she deletes it. They can not post her status, picture or information if she deactivates her account, thus making the case moot. They can’t violate her privacy if her profile no longer exists. Nice spin, though.

]]> http://trueslant.com/KashmirHill/2009/08/19/facebook-privacy-lawsuit/comment-page-1/#comment-509 hahahaha23 Thu, 05 Nov 2009 20:01:23 +0000 http://trueslant.com/KashmirHill/?p=1339#comment-509 If you knew law you would know that Plaintiff Beck needs to keep her account active in order to have a case. Her case is moot (legal term, FYI) if she deletes it. They can not post her status, picture or information if she makes it deactivates her account, thus making the case moot. They can't violate her privacy if her profile no longer exists. Nice spin, though. If you knew law you would know that Plaintiff Beck needs to keep her account active in order to have a case. Her case is moot (legal term, FYI) if she deletes it. They can not post her status, picture or information if she makes it deactivates her account, thus making the case moot. They can’t violate her privacy if her profile no longer exists. Nice spin, though.

]]>