When grabbing headlines from your blog, I read “A reputation nightmare: Becoming the ’sexting’ mascot,” and I see her name and face. The message I take from this two-second scan is that an identifiable Joanna Argus is a sexter. This is exactly the type of public reaction I believe Ms. Argus wishes to prevent. I grant you that a full reading of your article indicates that the smiling Ms. Argus is unlikely to publicize images of her unmentionables. From a privacy standpoint, however, I have trouble understanding the need to photographically identify her. An image of a cellphone with its screen blurred would seem equally effective at grabbing reader attention (what? sex?!), without further publicizing the face of a woman who does not want her face publicized.