What Is True/Slant?
275+ knowledgeable contributors.
Reporting and insight on news of the moment.
Follow them and join the news conversation.
 

Aug. 6 2009 - 11:27 am | 15 views | 2 recommendations | 4 comments

We’re all being tracked all the time. Is it necessary?

A Wi-Fi detector

Can we be connected without being constantly detected?

The Electronic Frontier Foundation (EFF) is probably the greatest warrior in the U.S. fighting to protect your privacy. Its legions of lawyers and computer experts are constantly sifting through company policies and government legislation to see how our privacy is being compromised.

The non-profit organization’s latest battle cry is “the need for locational privacy.” It defines it as “the ability of an individual to move in public space with the expectation that under normal circumstances their location will not be systematically and secretly recorded for later use.”

The EFF released a report this week about our locational privacy and “how to avoid losing it forever:”

Innovative new technologies can make it easier to pay your bridge toll or bus fare, to search for nearby businesses from your cell phone, and to get in and out of secure areas with a card instead of a key. But these systems also pose a dramatic threat to locational privacy — your ability to move in public spaces without the systematic recording of where you are and when you are there.

In a report released today, the Electronic Frontier Foundation (EFF) documents how your location information is collected by various popular electronic devices and services, and argues for concrete technological solutions that would allow you to enjoy these systems’ benefits without sacrificing your privacy in your everyday life.

via Who Knows Where You Are, And Why? | Electronic Frontier Foundation.

Get the benefits without the sacrifices?  Sounds good to me!

Wired Magazine’s Threat Level blog sums up the main locational privacy threats:

* Monthly transit swipe-cards.

* Electronic tolling devices (FastTrak, EZpass, congestion pricing)

* Cellphones.

* Services telling you when your friends are nearby.

* Searches on your PDA for services and businesses near your current location.

* Free Wi-Fi with ads for businesses near the network access point you’re using

* Electronic swipe cards for doors.

* Parking meters you can call to add money to, and which send you a text message when your time is running out.

via Digitized Stalking Is the New World Order | Threat Level | Wired.com.

We leave traces of ourselves behind constantly, thanks to all the convenient digital devices we use. I am in big favor of convenience, and am willing to give up a bit of privacy in order to find the best dumpling place in my area. But if we can have both privacy AND convenience AND amazing dumplings, well, that sounds just super. The EFF says we can:

“The technical solution to preserving privacy in digital services lies in modern cryptography and careful design,” said Stanford University mathematician Andrew J. Blumberg, the white paper’s other co-writer. “It may seem counterintuitive, but using cryptography, these systems can function without collecting and storing personal data at all. The best way for systems to protect user data is not to collect it in the first place; then the information is not available for anyone to buy, steal, or obtain by subpoena — it would stay truly private.”

Read the full EFF research paper here.


Comments

Active Conversation
3 T/S Member Comments Called Out, 4 Total Comments
Post your comment »
 
  1. collapse expand

    I’d be really worried if tollbooths only accepted FastTrak – if you can opt out of convenience in order to get your privacy, that seems like a fair deal. But any cell phone user who thinks that they can’t be tracked at any time is kidding themselves. If you don’t want the phone company to know where you are, turn off your phone!

  2. collapse expand

    A lot of current & former Berkmanites work at crazy-important digital watchdog tanks like the EFF. Few recognize just how heavy the work by dot orgs like the Internet Archive, Citizen Media Law, Joel Fights Back, etc. are. But it’s like I’ve been saying for two years now in their comments sections–put tech hippies in charge of your communications, and none but tech hippies will know or care you exist.

    Also, re: EFF
    They have an assortment of sssssick CC-licensed logos here: http://www.eff.org/press/logos
    And “Deeplinks” is one of my favorite blog names on the net.

  3. collapse expand

    You don’t need to keep your phone on, just when you change locations, for “them” to know where you are. OTOH, be relieved that unless you’re interesting or famous, there’s too much cell data out there to make much sense of it for the general population. Not that basing our privacy on limitations in technology is a good thing, but it’s the way it’s been so far.

Log in for notification options
Comments RSS

Post Your Comment

You must be logged in to post a comment

Log in with your True/Slant account.

Previously logged in with Facebook?

Create an account to join True/Slant now.

Facebook users:
Create T/S account with Facebook
 

My T/S Activity Feed

 
     

    About Me

    I am a writer, reporter, editor and blogger. I'm an editor at Above The Law, where I blog about lawyers, judges, law firms and the legal industry. Here at True/Slant, I write about our changing notions of privacy.

    If you have story ideas or tips, e-mail me at kashhill@trueslant.com. I've hung out in quite a few newsrooms over the last few years. Currently, I can be found in Breaking Media's Nolita office. In the past, I've been found in midtown Manhattan at The Week Magazine, in Hong Kong at the International Herald Tribune, and in D.C. at the National Press Foundation and the Washington Examiner.

    I have few illusions about privacy -- feel free to follow me on Twitter: kashhill. Or friend me on Facebook... though I might put you on limited profile.

    See my profile »
    Followers: 401
    Contributor Since: March 2009
    Location:New York, NY

    What I'm Up To

    • Staying Above The Law

      judge

      Over at Above The Law, I write about lawyers, law firms, judges and the legal industry.

      We especially like “colorful news.” (Yes, that’s a euphemism for gossip.)

      Check out the site here and my stuff here.

      logo

       
    • Writing with real ink

      While most of my writing occurs online at Above The Law and True/Slant, I do occasionally venture into the world of print.  These are some of the magazines and newspapers that I’ve written for:

      The Washington Post

      Washingtonian Magazine

      Time Out New York

      The Orange County Register

      The Washington Examiner

       
    • Recent projects

      washingtonian issue for tsThe latest (and longest) “real ink” project: the cover story for Washingtonian Magazine’s December issue.

      While I’m usually a writer and reporter, I’m sometimes asked to play pundit. In November, the New York Times asked me to write a mini op-ed for its Room for Debate blog. In December, BBC radio asked me to talk about Mark Zuckerberg and Facebook privacy settings for its Newshour (19:00 minute mark), based on this True/Slant post.

       
    .<
    • +O
    • +O
    • +O
    >.