<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Free computer analysis of your beauty. What&#8217;s the catch?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://trueslant.com/KashmirHill/2009/07/01/free-computer-analysis-of-your-beauty-whats-the-catch/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://trueslant.com/KashmirHill/2009/07/01/free-computer-analysis-of-your-beauty-whats-the-catch/</link>
	<description>Musings on the ebb and flow of privacy in the digital age</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 23 Dec 2011 00:11:44 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: mrsandyclark</title>
		<link>http://trueslant.com/KashmirHill/2009/07/01/free-computer-analysis-of-your-beauty-whats-the-catch/comment-page-1/#comment-129</link>
		<dc:creator>mrsandyclark</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 04 Jul 2009 07:24:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://trueslant.com/KashmirHill/?p=858#comment-129</guid>
		<description>Kashmir,
 
We all owe you a great deal of thanks for finding out what happens when you are an 8.12 out of 10 according to the terms of service.  Will it be the same as a 9.98 out of 10?  You don&#039;t know because they would never tell an 8.12 the terms for a 9.98.  They could use your face on before and after diet ads.
 
I&#039;m just kidding.  All I can think of is that IQ test that no matter how many times I took it, I got something like a 135, but it never really told me how I did.  It wasn&#039;t like I got a 135 out of 160, so I was at approximately the 84 % range.  There was not one fucking question on that test that I got wrong I tell you.  Oh.  So...you got an 81.2%.  So, for every 100 people 18.8 are more beautiful than you are.  Gosh, that sounds even worse.  Sorry, I guess figures don&#039;t lie.  By the way, why do you want a mess of gay men that score high to e-mail you?
 
Sandy</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Kashmir,</p>
<p>We all owe you a great deal of thanks for finding out what happens when you are an 8.12 out of 10 according to the terms of service.  Will it be the same as a 9.98 out of 10?  You don&#8217;t know because they would never tell an 8.12 the terms for a 9.98.  They could use your face on before and after diet ads.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m just kidding.  All I can think of is that IQ test that no matter how many times I took it, I got something like a 135, but it never really told me how I did.  It wasn&#8217;t like I got a 135 out of 160, so I was at approximately the 84 % range.  There was not one fucking question on that test that I got wrong I tell you.  Oh.  So&#8230;you got an 81.2%.  So, for every 100 people 18.8 are more beautiful than you are.  Gosh, that sounds even worse.  Sorry, I guess figures don&#8217;t lie.  By the way, why do you want a mess of gay men that score high to e-mail you?</p>
<p>Sandy</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kashmir Hill - The Not-So Private Parts - Ass lobster in urban dictionary - True/Slant</title>
		<link>http://trueslant.com/KashmirHill/2009/07/01/free-computer-analysis-of-your-beauty-whats-the-catch/comment-page-1/#comment-126</link>
		<dc:creator>Kashmir Hill - The Not-So Private Parts - Ass lobster in urban dictionary - True/Slant</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Jul 2009 16:01:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://trueslant.com/KashmirHill/?p=858#comment-126</guid>
		<description>[...] how hot, or not, I am. For the record, I did rate just a little lower than Angelina Jolie in a facial beauty analysis. This doesn&#8217;t just happen to female legal bloggers. Figure skaters deal with it [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] how hot, or not, I am. For the record, I did rate just a little lower than Angelina Jolie in a facial beauty analysis. This doesn&#8217;t just happen to female legal bloggers. Figure skaters deal with it [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kashmir Hill</title>
		<link>http://trueslant.com/KashmirHill/2009/07/01/free-computer-analysis-of-your-beauty-whats-the-catch/comment-page-1/#comment-125</link>
		<dc:creator>Kashmir Hill</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Jul 2009 13:29:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://trueslant.com/KashmirHill/?p=858#comment-125</guid>
		<description>Maybe I&#039;ll add that to my &quot;About Me&quot; section, Andrea.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Maybe I&#8217;ll add that to my &#8220;About Me&#8221; section, Andrea.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Marc Flores</title>
		<link>http://trueslant.com/KashmirHill/2009/07/01/free-computer-analysis-of-your-beauty-whats-the-catch/comment-page-1/#comment-124</link>
		<dc:creator>Marc Flores</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Jul 2009 06:25:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://trueslant.com/KashmirHill/?p=858#comment-124</guid>
		<description>When I uploaded my photo, a bot on the website automatically emailed both my parents with an apology and condolences. Is that bad?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>When I uploaded my photo, a bot on the website automatically emailed both my parents with an apology and condolences. Is that bad?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: andreaitis</title>
		<link>http://trueslant.com/KashmirHill/2009/07/01/free-computer-analysis-of-your-beauty-whats-the-catch/comment-page-1/#comment-122</link>
		<dc:creator>andreaitis</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Jul 2009 21:27:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://trueslant.com/KashmirHill/?p=858#comment-122</guid>
		<description>&quot;I rated just below Angelina Jolie in a facial beauty analysis.&quot;  

That&#039;s a t-shirt waiting to happen, Kash.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;I rated just below Angelina Jolie in a facial beauty analysis.&#8221;  </p>
<p>That&#8217;s a t-shirt waiting to happen, Kash.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: <fb:name linked="false" useyou="false" uid="1">SteveInTransit</fb:name></title>
		<link>http://trueslant.com/KashmirHill/2009/07/01/free-computer-analysis-of-your-beauty-whats-the-catch/comment-page-1/#comment-121</link>
		<dc:creator><fb:name linked="false" useyou="false" uid="1">SteveInTransit</fb:name></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Jul 2009 20:26:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://trueslant.com/KashmirHill/?p=858#comment-121</guid>
		<description>Assuming the shape of one&#039;s face doesn&#039;t change, there are all sorts of things that can be done with one&#039;s appearance to make the photo unappealing for commercial use... but it does seem like a very deceptive way to get loads of free stock photos.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Assuming the shape of one&#8217;s face doesn&#8217;t change, there are all sorts of things that can be done with one&#8217;s appearance to make the photo unappealing for commercial use&#8230; but it does seem like a very deceptive way to get loads of free stock photos.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

