What Is True/Slant?
275+ knowledgeable contributors.
Reporting and insight on news of the moment.
Follow them and join the news conversation.
 

Jun. 2 2009 - 10:56 am | 815 views | 0 recommendations | 2 comments

Revenge porn (Or: Another reason not to take nude photos)

Sex, Lies, and Videotape

Image via Wikipedia

When you’re in love, life is glorious. Your paramour seems to be capable of doing no wrong — the paragon of devotion and passion. You’ll share anything with your perfect partner. Home-cooked meals. Your most intimate thoughts. Tales of your family and upbringing. Your friends. Nude photos in the bedroom.

Well, that last one has never seemed particularly wise to me. (Good thing, given the number of ex-boyfriends I’ve racked up. Though only one who kind of hates me.) Because when things turn sour, all that you have shared can be suddenly and painfully used against you as the wooing and cooing transforms into psychological warfare.

While tales of youthful indiscretions and deep-seated insecurities can be employed as weapons in verbal combat, it is the nude photos that become the WMD capable of inflicting the most tangible damage to your life, livelihood and reputation. This is thanks in part to websites designed to house “revenge porn.” A paper by University of California (Davis) law professor, Anupam Chander, on “youthful indiscretion in an Internet age” pointed me to the website Ex Girlfriend Pictures (http://www.exgfpics.com/blog/ — WARNING: Not safe for work…. or ever, really). The tagline for the site is “Submitted Photos of Nude Ex Girlfriends & Former Wives.”

There, angry boyfriends (and ex-husbands) have posted photos of their exes posing naked and/or mid-sex. I looked through what was on the front page, and I was seriously scandalized. There were angles of women’s bodies I never thought I would see without going to med school first to become an ob/gyn.

And those who post are not just driven by hate. Here’s one testimonial relayed by the site’s creator:

Milo says he was always a big fan of his ex girlfriend’s big boobies, and who wouldn’t be!? he also says that there’s no real story behind their relationship or break-up. They had a hell of a lot of fun while they were dating and the relationship just ran it’s course. She loved the attention she got from her huge rack, though. So, Milo knows she would probably be flattered to discover so many men drooling over her chest Well, it’s working for me, Milo. Thanks!

Somehow I suspect that she would not in fact be flattered.

The site has been around and active since 2005. Given that the website creator appears to be doing the posting of the pics and commenting on them, I’m a bit shocked he hasn’t been sued and the site dismantled. Given his active involvement in the posting, he would seem to lose the protection granted by the ironically named Communications Decency Act, which protects content hosters from liability for the content posted by their users. Does not including the women’s names or identifying information really protect him from being sued?

More amazingly, lots of us keep taking nude photos despite the risks of their going viral online. According to a 2008 survey from the National Campaign to Prevent Teen and Unplanned Pregnancy [PDF], if you’ve allowed a nude photo to be taken of you, you are far from alone:

How many young adults are sending or posting nude or seminude
images of themselves?

– 33% of young adults overall

– 36% of young adult women

– 31% of young adult men

via SexTech_Summary.pdf (application/pdf Object).

If you’re more Not-So Privately Progressive than me and you’re cool with nude photos spreading on the Internet like David after Dentist, then by all means, break out the camera in the bedroom. If not, it may be best to commit those nude images to memory rather than a memory stick.


Comments

2 Total Comments
Post your comment »
 
Log in for notification options
Comments RSS

Post Your Comment

You must be logged in to post a comment

Log in with your True/Slant account.

Previously logged in with Facebook?

Create an account to join True/Slant now.

Facebook users:
Create T/S account with Facebook
 

My T/S Activity Feed

 
     

    About Me

    I am a writer, reporter, editor and blogger. I'm an editor at Above The Law, where I blog about lawyers, judges, law firms and the legal industry. Here at True/Slant, I write about our changing notions of privacy.

    If you have story ideas or tips, e-mail me at kashhill@trueslant.com. I've hung out in quite a few newsrooms over the last few years. Currently, I can be found in Breaking Media's Nolita office. In the past, I've been found in midtown Manhattan at The Week Magazine, in Hong Kong at the International Herald Tribune, and in D.C. at the National Press Foundation and the Washington Examiner.

    I have few illusions about privacy -- feel free to follow me on Twitter: kashhill. Or friend me on Facebook... though I might put you on limited profile.

    See my profile »
    Followers: 401
    Contributor Since: March 2009
    Location:New York, NY

    What I'm Up To

    • Staying Above The Law

      judge

      Over at Above The Law, I write about lawyers, law firms, judges and the legal industry.

      We especially like “colorful news.” (Yes, that’s a euphemism for gossip.)

      Check out the site here and my stuff here.

      logo

       
    • Writing with real ink

      While most of my writing occurs online at Above The Law and True/Slant, I do occasionally venture into the world of print.  These are some of the magazines and newspapers that I’ve written for:

      The Washington Post

      Washingtonian Magazine

      Time Out New York

      The Orange County Register

      The Washington Examiner

       
    • Recent projects

      washingtonian issue for tsThe latest (and longest) “real ink” project: the cover story for Washingtonian Magazine’s December issue.

      While I’m usually a writer and reporter, I’m sometimes asked to play pundit. In November, the New York Times asked me to write a mini op-ed for its Room for Debate blog. In December, BBC radio asked me to talk about Mark Zuckerberg and Facebook privacy settings for its Newshour (19:00 minute mark), based on this True/Slant post.

       
    .<
    • +O
    • +O
    • +O
    >.