What Is True/Slant?
275+ knowledgeable contributors.
Reporting and insight on news of the moment.
Follow them and join the news conversation.
 

May. 8 2009 - 5:06 pm | 3,689 views | 0 recommendations | 2 comments

The frustrating quest for protection from anonymous Web surfers

Do website operators need to do more to protect our privacy when it comes to anonymous comments posted on their sites?

In February, an anonymous poster uploaded a Texas woman’s photo on the gossip blog TheDirty.com and wrote a message saying she had “herpes, is fat, is sexually promiscuous and uses cocaine. ” The poster asked whether the blog’s founder, Hooman Karamian, would still sleep with the woman, and he responded, “No, I don’t want to get infected.”

The woman, a 27-year-old paralegal, who apparently actually has herpes and wants to keep her identity secret during litigation, has sued the website operator for hosting the photo and the disparaging comments about her on his  site.

From the Houston Chronicle:

Chris Bell, the Houston lawyer who filed the lawsuit, said he doesn’t think Karamian should be protected under the federal Communications Decency Act provision that keeps Web providers from being liable for what’s posted by others.

“This guy has made a fortune off of embarrassing people,” Bell said. When Karamian adds comments validating what someone has submitted, Bell said, he has responsibility.

“We’ve got to do something whereby folks posting on the Internet are playing by defamation and privacy laws, too,” Bell said. It is illegal in Texas to publish private facts that, when revealed, would be offensive to a reasonable person and are not a legitimate public concern.

via Web post on herpes at center of La Porte woman’s suit | – Houston Chronicle.

This lawsuit raises lots of issues: whether websites are responsible for what their readers write, whether websites that encourage these kinds of conversations bear more responsibility than others, and what is considered an invasion of privacy online. Mentioned above, the Communications Decency Act is legislation that Congress passed to protect the free flow of information online by stating that websites could not be sued for carrying defamatory material.

There’s push back against that law though, in its protection for website operators at the expense of individuals. There are a number of lawsuits like this one, alleging online defamation and invasion of privacy, making their way through the court system. See, for example, this Portfolio Magazine article on such a suit filed by two Yale law students against AutoAdmit, a legal gossip site.

Website operators are starting to worry more seriously about the trouble their commenters may cause them. But for now, it’s a waiting game to see what the courts decide.


Comments

2 Total Comments
Post your comment »
 
  1. collapse expand

    Whatever happened to the “safe harbor” defense?

  2. collapse expand

    [...] with the Communications Decency Act (a.k.a. Section 230(c)(1)) which I discussed at greater length last week. To protect the free flow of information, Congress has immunized content hosts from prosecution for [...]

Log in for notification options
Comments RSS

Post Your Comment

You must be logged in to post a comment

Log in with your True/Slant account.

Previously logged in with Facebook?

Create an account to join True/Slant now.

Facebook users:
Create T/S account with Facebook
 

My T/S Activity Feed

 
 

About Me

I am a writer, reporter, editor and blogger. I'm an editor at Above The Law, where I blog about lawyers, judges, law firms and the legal industry. Here at True/Slant, I write about our changing notions of privacy.

If you have story ideas or tips, e-mail me at kashhill@trueslant.com. I've hung out in quite a few newsrooms over the last few years. Currently, I can be found in Breaking Media's Nolita office. In the past, I've been found in midtown Manhattan at The Week Magazine, in Hong Kong at the International Herald Tribune, and in D.C. at the National Press Foundation and the Washington Examiner.

I have few illusions about privacy -- feel free to follow me on Twitter: kashhill. Or friend me on Facebook... though I might put you on limited profile.

See my profile »
Followers: 278
Contributor Since: March 2009
Location:New York, NY

What I'm Up To

  • Staying Above The Law

    judge

    Over at Above The Law, I write about lawyers, law firms, judges and the legal industry.

    We especially like “colorful news.” (Yes, that’s a euphemism for gossip.)

    Check out the site here and my stuff here.

    logo

     
  • Writing with real ink

    While most of my writing occurs online at Above The Law and True/Slant, I do occasionally venture into the world of print.  These are some of the magazines and newspapers that I’ve written for:

    The Washington Post

    Washingtonian Magazine

    Time Out New York

    The Orange County Register

    The Washington Examiner

     
  • Recent projects

    washingtonian issue for tsThe latest (and longest) “real ink” project: the cover story for Washingtonian Magazine’s December issue.

    While I’m usually a writer and reporter, I’m sometimes asked to play pundit. In November, the New York Times asked me to write a mini op-ed for its Room for Debate blog. In December, BBC radio asked me to talk about Mark Zuckerberg and Facebook privacy settings for its Newshour (19:00 minute mark), based on this True/Slant post.

     
.<
  • +O
  • +O
  • +O
>.